ComScore Finds “Unprecedented” Slowdown in U.K. E-tail Holiday Traffic

Written by Fred J. Aun
December 10th, 2008

The early holiday shopping season found fewer consumers hitting U.K. retail Web sites compared with last year’s identical period, with some major sites seeing double-digit declines, according to Comscore.

The measuring company said November online traffic in the U.K. saw Tesco’s traffic decline a whopping 28 percent for the period, while Amazon’s was 21 percent lower, European eBay sites were getting 20 percent fewer online visitors, Home Retail took a 16 percent traffic hit and Apple dropped 8 percent.

"This is totally unprecedented," said comScore International Press Analyst Jamie Gavin. "I would echo the words of my colleagues in the U.S.. They saw an unprecedented falloff in ecommerce spending." Gavin said comScore does not yet measure ecommerce spending in Europe, just site traffic.

The analyst said finding one specific answer to explain the trend is difficult.

"While we do know the markets are down and we are living in uncertain times, it is difficult to give a reason for that," Gavin said. "You could look at it positively and say Internet shoppers get savvier every year. So perhaps they are going online less or maybe it’s taking people less visits to get done what they want."

Gavin said there’s a chance the final weeks of the holiday shopping season will bring a sudden surge in traffic. He’s not betting on it, though.

"At this point, I would be going out on a massive limb to predict they could regain all that momentum," Gavin said. "I definitely do think they’ll gain some ground back. The way the economy has been, people are perhaps just waiting a little longer to seek bargains."


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.