Digital Watermarking, From The Serious To The Truly Strange

Written by Evan Schuman
July 26th, 2006

We’re starting to hear about more digital watermark applications, where the image-capturing (camera) and communication capabilities of cellphones make them ideal tools to connect printed material with Web sites. We reported last month about NeoMedia and its digital watermark flavor called iPOS (Interactive Point of Sale). This week saw an Oregon company called Digimarc roll out its version in a series of cafes in Japan.

The two approaches illustrate the versatility of this hybrid, which literally is multi-channel as it bridges a customer experience from a purely brick-and-mortar activity–such as looking at a poster in a promotion display–to online. But it does it with virtually (no pun intended) no physical activity on the part of the customer.

The NeoMedia take was all-business and involved connecting customers from promotional material to Web content and perhaps Web POS. The Digimarc Japan rollout is solidly in the entertainment space. The cafes are a Japanese chain called Amusement Cafe Maids which feature–I couldn’t make this up–“servers dressed like maids who entertain their guests by dressing up as characters from favorite video game and comic book series and singing, dancing, and playing games with their customers.”

Those customers download reader software and then use their phones to scan digitally watermarked images on lots of items including drink coasters. They’ll then be able to access information that they’ll need to know about the characters. Please don’t get me wrong, but I am assuming sobriety is discouraged in these establishments, which will make the typing-less data entry even more convenient.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.