Doing Online Fulfillment In-Store Is Harder Than Macy’s Thought

Written by Frank Hayes
May 16th, 2012

Macy’s efforts to move online order fulfillment into almost 300 of its stores this year got a look from the Wall Street Journal on Monday (May 14), and the result wasn’t pretty: The Journal described the in-store Macy’s distribution center in a Paramus, N.J., mall as “a dimly-lit, makeshift packing area” and said workers struggled to find merchandise in the store that exactly matched orders specifying colors with non-intuitive names such as “journey” and “magical.” Amazon this ain’t.

The irony is that Macy’s may already have the answer to its product-finding problem—by leveraging a completely different in-store IT initiative.

The Journal piece described the problems of director of store fulfillment Danya El Zein as she hunted for a Fossil wallet and a Michael Kors purse on the Paramus store’s sales floor. While a robot in an Amazon warehouse “can be programmed to find a specific item in the right size and color by reading a barcode, retail jargon can often trip up a human doing the same job by hand. It took Ms. El Zein several tries to find a LeSportsac travel tote in the color ‘Journey,’ a diagonal zig-zag print,” the Journal said.

Fair enough—Macy’s doesn’t hire robots at the director level. But Macy’s does have a plan to roll out item-level RFID chain-wide by the end of 2013. (Reports on this vary—a recent Citi retail analysis said that was scheduled to happen before the end of 2012.)

With an RFID gun in hand, Macy’s in-store DC workers should be able to track down exactly the right item almost instantly. If the system is really clever, it should be possible to automatically download the items to be searched for into the gun, so picking out the right merchandise won’t even require referring to a screen.

Did Macy’s have that in mind when it launched the in-store DC and item-level RFID projects in parallel? The chain isn’t saying. But if it was coincidence, it’s another reminder that there’s no such thing as a standalone retail IT project. Even if they aren’t planned to interact, the projects will—either to support or to interfere with each other.

And for the record, Macy’s spokesman Jim Sluzewski—who accompanied the Journal reporter—describes the Paramus shipping room as “clean and well-organized for the flow of taking, filling and shipping orders,” but “no more or less fancy than any fulfillment center. I believe the reporter was distinguishing a shipping room from the glitz of the sales floor.” So there.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.