E-Commerce Drains Billions of Letters from Post Office

Written by Evan Schuman
December 8th, 2004

The traditionally long lines in post offices during the holiday season are noticeably shorter this year, and figures released Wednesday show why.

About 1.1 billion fewer pieces of snail mail were sent in 2004, and that’s on top of an almost 3.5 billion drop from 2003 and a 1.3 billion drop from 2002. All told, the government’s figures show that Americans sent 103.7 billion pieces of first-class mail in 2001 and only 97.9 billion pieces in 2004, a loss of some 5.8 billion pieces of mail or about a 6 percent drop.

Paul Harrington, a spokesman for the U.S. Postal Service, blamed the first-class decline on technology. E-mail is clearly a culprit, he said, but fax, instant messaging and various other forms of electronic communication are also playing a role.

Although this may be a bad sign for the future of the handwritten letter to grandma, Harrington says this is much more a business issue, with business communications still accounting for the vast majority (“high 80s,” he projects) of all first-class mail.

The ability for many companies to collect payments by wire transfer, PayPal, direct deposit and even credit cards is taking a huge bite out of the checks that get mailed to businesses. And Web bill access is starting to shrink the number of bills that have to go out.

“Many vendors are accepting payment online. We’re reaching the point where it appears that there is not going to be a continuous growth of first-class mail,” Harrington said. “That was one of the assumptions we operated on for a very long time.”

Package shipments are a different story. From 2000 through 2002, package shipments started to decline?from 1.13 billion pieces in 2000 to 1.09 billion in 2001 and 1.07 billion in 2002.

That multiyear dip had been attributed to e-commerce players taking over shipments of tons of packages?especially around the holidays?and opting to use Federal Express, Airborne, DHL and UPS a lot more than the post office.

Much of that initial package loss, Harrington said, was because the post office was still “highly regulated” and therefore couldn’t offer the same kind of discounts and special incentives that private companies could.

But the U.S. Postal Service has now reversed that slump, with its 2003 package numbers pushed back up to 1.13 billion and the newly released 2004 numbers showing roughly the same figures for this year.

Harrington said the leveling off appears to be for two reasons. First, the Post Office has consistently offered package shipment services that are much lower cost than private rivals’ offerings. With businesses and consumers cutting back, cost is a key issue.

Secondly, at least one small corner of e-commerce has been very friendly to the Post Office: eBay. Not only does eBay prominently push the post office as a shipment option, Harrington said, but it’s creating package opportunities that simply didn’t exist before.

“The Internet has opened up new opportunities to us,” he said. “These eBay sales, before they would have happened at a yard sale, a collector’s convention, some sort of venue like that where package shipping of any kind wasn’t needed.”

In a clear win for the post office, bulk business mail (often affectionately known as junk mail) has been soaring in popularity recently, despite initial fears that the much cheaper spam would hurt it.

After a sharp drop from 2000 (90.1 billion pieces) to 2002 (87.2 billion pieces), it’s picked up dramatically, hitting 90.4 billion pieces in 2003 and 95.6 billion pieces in 2004. The one-year 5.1 billion reported increase for 2004 far exceeded even the postal service’s internal projection, which predicted an increase of only 3.9 billion pieces.

Harrington attributes the bulk business increases to postal rates having remained stable “for one of the longest periods” in postal history, adding that SPAM has proven much less effective than bulk snail mail. Also, he noted that bulk business mail also includes a lot of requested documents, such as catalogues.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.