EBay’s AdContext Launch Date Slipping

Written by Evan Schuman
November 5th, 2006

When EBay announced its June that it would launch a contextual Web ad service (a la Google’s AdWords) to be called EBay AdContext, officials there said the service was slated to launch in December. On Friday, officials said private beta test results are still being dealt with and that the launch is now slated for next year’s first quarter.

The change is slight and is certainly in keeping with the software industry’s history of never shipping a product until it’s past time, but it’s worthy of note for Web site owners who are interested in exploring the offering.

The service is indeed similar to Google’s AdWords, but with one key difference. AdWords is a clear advertiser service, where it displays ads for any advertiser in the world whose product/service match keywords. EBay’s AdContext is intended to be a service that only advertises EBay itself, by alerting visitors to EBay auctions that match specific keywords.

If a site is writing about, for example, retailers struggling with the need for more POS units, EBay’s AdContext might alert visitors to a current auction selling used POS units.

The difference with Google’s AdWords is an assumed greater time urgency. Someone might look at a Google ad and file it away for possible future action. An advertiser might never link that inquiry two months later with the Google ad. But the EBay link would likely be to a time-limited auction, theoretically making a quick purchase?and an associated clear advertiser ROI?more likely.

As for the delay, it’s not yet severe, but the program could see more delays next year. On June 21, EBay spokesperson Ali Croft said EBay “expects” AdContext to be live “later this year,” but she added at the time that “the official launch timing will depend on how the Beta goes.”

On Friday, Croft said that EBay was working through the private beta feedback and that the program was now slated to launch in January, but she quickly amended that to “first quarter.” (Editor’s Note: The EBay beta program referenced is a standard beta evaluation program. We are saying “private beta” to differentiate from some recent beta tests?from vendors including Microsoft and Google?that are made available to the general public. EBay’s beta program is limited to a group of hand-selected users, just the way beta programs were done before the world was Web.)


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.