Efficiency Gone Wild: Target’s Easy Way To Screw Up Prices

Written by Frank Hayes
January 26th, 2011

Pricing mistakes are still the bane of E-Commerce, and now Target seems to have come up with a much more efficient way of creating them. Last Sunday (Jan. 16), Target began offering a Sony PlayStation 3 (list price: $350 to $500) for $39.99 on both and the retailer’s Amazon store. What’s interesting, though, is how the foul-up appears to have happened. It looks like there really was a new product Target intended to sell. But instead of creating a new page for that product, a Web site designer decided to modify an existing page—and before that new page was completed, it somehow hit the sites.

The clues are in the mismatched description on for the product, which the small print describes as the “PlayStation Move sharp shooter.” It turns out there is a new add-on for the PlayStation with that name. According to Sony, its list price is $39.99 (which matches the page) and it is scheduled to be available in February (which matches the description on Target’s page that reads, “Arriving soon! Order now for shipment in 2 to 4 weeks”).

The price, delivery date and small-print description all match up with the yet-to-be-released product. But what wasn’t changed from the outdated page were the headline, picture and customer reviews (which are all dated 2007).

Apparently, halfway through the process of editing the page for the new product, it was sent to the production system and automatically turned into a live page on the site. And that apparently triggered a revival of the outdated page in Target’s Amazon store, which included none of the inconsistent details except the $39.99 price.

That’s an E-Commerce nightmare: A few wrong keystrokes, plus the automation that’s designed to make an E-Commerce site easy to manage, resulted in an absurd price for a product that the retailer doesn’t have in stock anyway.

When the mismatched Target PlayStation description went live, alert customers quickly jumped on the deal and spread the word across the Internet, even though both Web pages contained a mishmash of contradictory information—for example,’s description was for a machine-gun-like game controller, not the PlayStation itself—and both sites listed the product as “out of stock.”

Target and Amazon both have policies published on their Web sites that let them cancel orders because of pricing errors, and the next day customers received E-mails with the bad news.

This incident is reminiscent—although not as spectacular as—what happened with a pricing-engine error last year at Zappos, which resulted in the E-tailer honoring mistakenly low prices and losing $1.6 million.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.