Gap Merges The E-Commerce Backend Of Its Four Brands

Written by Evan Schuman
May 30th, 2008

Shoppers at will now be able to use a single shopping cart and consolidate shipping at any of the chain’s four brands, the Gap announced on Tuesday (May 27).

But the change for The Gap, Banana Republic, Old Navy and PiperLime is delicate, as the company still wants those brands to maintain their distinct personalities. Those conflicting goals give the new site a bit of a Jekyll-and-Hyde feel, as though a long-time favorite clothing store suddenly stopped remembering to take its medication.

For example, all four brand names are now prominently atop the navigation of every page, allowing the customer to move back and forth between brands. But a search for shoes, for example, has to be directed at one brand at a time. Given that the merger is designed for consumers who already shop at more than one of the Gap brands, the lack of a universal search seems odd.

The company also consolidated their shipping plans. Old Navy, for example, used to ship for a $5 flat rate, PiperLime was free and Banana Republic charged $7. Now all sites offer the $7 flat-rate program. PiperLime, which focuses on very high-end looking packaging, will continue to ship free and will ship separately. But purchases from any of the other three brands will arrive in one box.

The $16 billion chain, which operates more than 3,100 stores in the U.S., the U.K., Canada, France, Japan and Ireland, went through "a major rehaul of our online platform, from soup to nuts" in 2005, said Gap spokesperson Kris Marubio. "That gave us the platform for future projects." This is what resulted three years later.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.