Gen Y Threatens To Rewrite All The Retail Rules

Written by Evan Schuman
September 25th, 2008

Gen Y, a loose term for younger shoppers ranging in age from about 14 through 28, is a demographic that most retailers are unprepared for. That’s partially because this is the first segment that has never not known of the Internet and also because most retail executives have such a radically different worldview.

In addition, many Gen Y shoppers have never known—or believed they had—any privacy, so they are dramatically more willing to give up or sell personal data in exchange for something they see as having value. Their attention span is short, their multi-tasking skills are high and many find the idea of paying for software quaint and old-fashioned.

They can prioritize how they pay (Paypal’s popular) over how much they pay as well as how they want to interact with businesses—in as many ways as possible: text on their phones, IM on their laptops, posts for them on MySpace, video pitches in YouTube and avatars in SecondLife.

John Hiraoka, the chief marketing officer at Epicor, has become an expert on Gen Y, partially because of a nearby teacher: his teenage daughter. During a speech at his company’s user conference this week, Hiraoka told a room full of retail execs that they needed to look at the retail world through his 14-year-old’s eyes for a moment. He was right.

He made a slide out of a picture of her desk in a remarkably neat and tidy room. (The neatness of the room, he said, was the result of a bribe that Hiraoka declined to specify. As the father of a girl in the same age range, I can confirm that the casual approach to room organization seems to be a younger Gen Y trait.)

The point of the picture was to display her personal electronics, which—CPU-wise—rival what NASA had just a few years ago. It included her desktop computer, an iPod, Game Boy, cell phone, digital camera, CD burner, DVD burner, six USB drives and two wireless devices. And a dolphin, although I’m not sure what the point of the dolphin was.

Hiraoka argued that retailers need to hire a lot more Gen Y employees and listen to them. He promised execs that it would be a very different perspective: "These are the so-called digital natives," he said. "They’ve grown up with no newspapers, catalogs or phonebooks."

That’s all true, but prioritizing these consumers has many risks. How far can one go in communicating with them before alienating older demographics, many of which have a lot more money to spend?

Hiraoka counters that the Web theoretically allows retailers to communicate with many consumers individually, with a different approach and format for different demographics.

That is true and appropriate. But it’s also very expensive and would require a very different approach. Will retail execs agree to this tactic, on the say so of much less experienced employees? If so, will those execs rename the demographic as Gen Y-oh-Why?


One Comment | Read Gen Y Threatens To Rewrite All The Retail Rules

  1. Greg Rollett Says:

    There’s also the factor of not paying for things, espicially electronic media such as music, movies and books. Getting through this is a tough sell for every party involved.

    Great article!


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.