Gomez: Oriental Trading Site Meltdown Probably Didn’t Happen

Written by Evan Schuman
September 15th, 2008

When a major site performance research site reported last week that the Oriental Trading Company Web site had a major meltdown through all of August, Oriental Trading officials raised questions about whether the report was correct. On Monday (Sept. 15), two leading site traffic tracking firms—including the firm that issued the original report—backed Oriental Trading’s position, to varying degrees.

The original report came from Gomez. And now Gomez is stepping back from its own report, according to report author Matt Poepsel, who serves as the Gomez Vice President of Performance Strategies.

"In layman’s terms, I believe the figures were incorrect," Poepsel said. "In this very unusual case, the (Oriental Trading Company) metrics were characterized by the system as unavailable for reasons that may not have reflected the experience of a typical end user. This can happen, for example, when a management system implements hard deadlines or errors in terms of page download times, error responses, page locations, page sizes or other administrative actions. While the system classified some (Oriental Trading Company) measurements as unavailable, an end user may or may not have actually abandoned the page that was being delivered. Although our benchmarks aim to serve as a proxy for the end-user experience, in this case I do not believe that proxy was an accurate reflection of (Oriental Trading Company) end-user experience for that period."

Poepsel said an internal Gomez review "may involve changes on our end."

Part of the confusion seemed to be that, on Aug. 2, Oriental Trading moved its Web server from one co-location facility to another, a transition that was wrapped by Aug. 3. The site sustained a "big outage" on Aug. 2—from 2 AM to 5 PM—but was fully back the next day, according to Brian Moen, Oriental’s VP for E-Commerce.

But Gomez’s software continued to "see" an outage all month, raising the possibility that it was looking at an IP address that was no longer active.

A Gomez competitor, Keynote Systems, reported this week that its software monitoring showed consistent uptime for Oriental Trading, other than from Aug. 1 through Aug. 3.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.