Google Chrome Privacy Settings Foretell Major E-Commerce Headaches

Written by Evan Schuman
September 8th, 2008

One of the biggest ongoing headaches for E-Commerce execs has been customizable options for browsers, pop-up blockers, firewalls, spyware blockers and any other applet that is hawked to consumers. Without such consistency, it’s impossible to control—or even predict—how Web pages will look and act for various customers and prospects.

With a new entry into the browser battleground—Google’s Chrome—comes more customization nightmares. This problem is going to get a lot worse very quickly, as many E-Commerce sites try and get more complex with more interactivity, multimedia and even 3-D experiments at the same time as consumers are getting more comfortable playing with their browser settings.

A new report from Pingdom, a Swedish Web uptime monitoring group, points out just a handful of the disconnects E-Commerce directors can soon expect, especially if consumers start using the privacy modes now being offered.

Problem One: Unique Visitor Analysis. At a practical level, the privacy setting sidesteps cookies. This will have the impact of sharply increasing the appearance of unique visitors, as repeat customers are seen as new.

In turn, this will likely cause a sharp drop in conversion rates, as your analytics software tries to figure out why all these new site visitors aren’t signing up. It’s because they already have, and your incognito visitors are hiding that fact.

Then there’s the fact that certain types of sites (not merely "adult" sites but ones that like to aggressively market, such as car or even book sites) are more likely to attract those using stealth modes and certain kinds of users (younger, more tech savvy) will be more likely to use that mode. Of course, there are tons of exceptions to those stereotypes.

Together, the report said, that’s going to make Web activity comparisons even more unreliable.

"Comparing visitor numbers between different types of sites will be like comparing apples and oranges. Some sites will have visitors that are more inclined to activate the privacy mode of a browser than others," the report said. "For example, a Webmaster with three sites with different kinds of content will have a hard time getting visitor statistics that he can use for comparing their relative success since (each site) would have different ratios of ‘privacy mode’ surfers."

In short, to the extent that cookie-based analysis was ever accurate and worth doing, it can no longer be relied on. This problem is hardly new. Sites need to focus on meaningful numbers, such as actual purchases and actual visits to a page. Asking for site registration for more advanced features is also something that consumers will tolerate more, and it will have to be seriously considered if tracking is a priority.

But will such registration efforts turn off customers? Will E-Commerce folk find themselves analyzing a smaller population? Perhaps analyzing the wrong segment of their prospects? It’s like those Web surveys that logically skew to the answers typically given by people between jobs and others who have plenty of time to fill out such things.

This is going to change from site to site, based on demographics. Many sites—more than some assume—will do fine with seeking registration as long as they don’t abuse the privilege and make sure to provide value to those customers who opt to register. Treating customers with respect and providing them value? Whoever said the Web can’t help businesses do better?


4 Comments | Read Google Chrome Privacy Settings Foretell Major E-Commerce Headaches

  1. Steve Sommers Says:

    For the life of me, as a user, I can’t understand why anyone would trust a browser by Google? Google is the company that started and perfected toolbar SPAM in that almost any software application you install also wants to install a side of toolbar.

  2. Greg Bellan Says:

    So far I’ve been pretty impressed with Chrome but I have to admit that I haven’t done any commerce with it yet.

  3. Jonathan Nakamichi Says:

    The transparency we get from having Chrome as an open source project helps me feel at ease about the trust issue. Also, Chrome’s design philosophy seems to be “remove anything that is not absolutely necessary”.

  4. Kasey Coburn Says:

    Have not had a chance to use it but still dont see the use of any other browser when microsoft updates and other microsoft related things only udate or use Internet Explorer.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.