Google Experiment Could Place Friend Rants Above Retail Results

Written by Fred J. Aun
November 4th, 2009

For time immemorial, or at least for a decade, E-tailers have been using everything from alchemy to algorithms to try and master search engine optimization (SEO). The oft-elusive goal: to have the almighty Google find their sites and place them high on prospective spenders’ search results pages. Now, as blogger Paul Gillen perfectly points out, the Don’t Be Evil Gods have changed the rules. With its experimental new program, called Social Search, Google is including–high on the precious first page of the results it fetches–items culled from the searcher’s social network sphere.

Say John wants to buy a Gateway computer and does the regular Google search for the model he likes. With the new Google program, a Facebook rant by John’s trusted college buddy Joe about how, say, Best Buy weaseled its way out of matching a competitor’s price for a Gateway might show up right next to an expensively SEO-fertilized Best Buy listing. Granted, the Google Social Search listings appear at the bottom of the first page, but there are retailers and vendors that would kill for that chunk of real estate.


2 Comments | Read Google Experiment Could Place Friend Rants Above Retail Results

  1. Patrick Says:

    Sounds good to me! Real observations from real people tend to be much more credible, don’t you think?

  2. Troy Says:

    I like the idea, but now I’ll have to rate my “friends” on their competence and objectiveness. Does google have a strategy for that?


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.