How Easily Should Social Networks Reveal Friends To E-Commerce Sites?

Written by Evan Schuman
September 15th, 2009

The foundation of the intersection of social networks and E-Commerce is that consumers will be much more likely to trust and buy from a retailer if they know that their friends are already buying from that chain. The Catch-22 of such an approach is that it’s difficult to get a consumer to name friends without some huge immediate benefit to that consumer. And, no, the unearthing of friends who already shop at an E-Commerce site is seen as a benefit to the retailer, not to the consumer.

One approach that has been tried is leveraging services such as Facebook Connect, which lets a user log onto Facebook and then log onto an E-Commerce site (using the same browser) and allow that site to access Facebook names—with the customer’s permission—without the customer revealing a Facebook password to the E-Commerce site. But then it runs into the limit of the system’s inability to display a friend’s shopping pattern without that friend’s permission. (“Hi, Brenda! I see that you’re shopping at Phil’s Pervert Video House, too.”)

One vendor, TurnTo Networks, has rolled out a tweak that might help a little. If consumers connect an E-Commerce site with their list of friends—either by typing them in or by connecting the merchant site with existing lists from Facebook, MySpace, LinkedIn or other social sites—it will give a heads-up that one friend has already used that site. It won’t say who it is, but it will ask that friend’s permission to be revealed.

The idea is a good one, but tiptoeing into this neighborhood is dangerous. What if the customer, for example, has only one or two friends listed? Wouldn’t this notification of “one of your friends has shopped here” be a privacy violation?

But there’s also the fundamental issue of how much people will use such a service. It’s easy to see how many GenY consumers will want to shop where their friends shop. But wouldn’t they be more likely to simply pose that question to their friends directly?

Another small hurdle: TurnTo’s existing merchants tend to be on the very small side—mostly niche merchants. That’s fine, though, because many of E-Commerce’s greatest treasures are found in relatively obscure sites. But what are the odds that someone’s friends will have already shopped there? Isn’t there a bad flip side to this if consumers are routinely being told “Nope. None of your friends shop here”? Most merchants would rather the system stay silent unless a friend is discovered to have shopped there.

A nice touch that TurnTo has added is that the social network integration can be done once, but used repeatedly. “Once it’s done, it’s done for any merchant that uses TurnTo,” said TurnTo CEO George Eberstadt, which lists about 24 merchants as participating. “If a friend-match is found and the friend has agreed to serve as a reference for the merchant, we show the shopper the friend’s name.”

Eberstadt argues that this approach can also be used to encourage return visits from existing customers. “The on-behalf-of-shopper E-mail is a powerful, friendly way to bring past-customers back to the site. For example: imagine you’re into your truck and you recently bought snazzy hubcaps at Stylintrucks,” he said. “You get a message from them to the effect that, ‘Your friend (insert name) is shopping here and has a question. Mind helping her out?’ with a link back to the site to take action.”

The integration of social networks and E-Commerce is essential, and it will happen. But there will be a lot of slips and falls en route. What TurnTo has done may not be perfect; early pioneer moves rarely are. It’s now up to E-Commerce giants to try crafting their own ideas.


One Comment | Read How Easily Should Social Networks Reveal Friends To E-Commerce Sites?

  1. George Eberstadt Says:

    A few points of clarification:

    “What if the customer, for example, has only one or two friends listed? Wouldn’t this notification of “one of your friends has shopped here” be a privacy violation?”

    => The system requires that the shopper have at least 50 friends before showing a count of matches. (That limit doesn’t apply to friends who have opted in to having their names shown, of course.)

    “Wouldn’t they be more likely to simply pose that question to their friends directly?”

    => Many people are hesitant to blast all their friends with “Hey, anyone know about X?” messages. People are much more likely to seek advice when they know who to ask. And sometimes, there’s no need to ask – just knowing that friends also shop at the same store is enough.

    “Most merchants would rather the system stay silent unless a friend is discovered to have shopped there.”

    => If there is no first-degree friend match, TurnTo shows other things like friends-of-friends, neighbors (based on zip code), popular items, and highly recommended items. So the system can still be helpful to the shopper while also giving the feeling of a crowded, buzzing store.

    George Eberstadt
    Founder and CEO


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.