How Intimate a CRM Relationship Do Your Customers Really Want?

Written by Evan Schuman
July 20th, 2004

To persuade customers to give up data, some retailers are considering using blind-taste-test third parties.

At the very heart of any robust retail CRM system are the benefits consumers?and retailers?receive when the retailer knows as much about a customer as possible. But what happens when the customer doesn’t want such an intimate relationship?

Not unlike romantic relationships, professional ones need to be based on either trust or a more calculated, Templeton-like “What’s in it for me?” Trust is often a balancing act, weighing “How much am I risking?” with “Do I have any reason yet to think this person/retailer will hurt me or be reckless with what I offer?”

The best example a retailer striking a good balance is Amazon gives consumers plenty of “What’s in it for me?” answers, identifying books they will like but have never heard of, saving them from typing in credit-card data and memorizing the addresses of themselves and of frequent gift recipients. They have also done an excellent job of minimizing security glitches getting into the headlines. Auction powerhouse eBay is another good example, with the keys to a million garage sales given only to those who share a chunk of personal data.

Is it a coincidence that neither of these retailers have physical storefronts? Flipping the question around, why is it that so many land-based (as opposed to LAN-based) retailers pay for CRM, and yet so few truly use its “reach out and upsell someone” capabilities?

Michael Richardson, chief technology officer at Smart System Technologies, is hoping he might have the answer. Richardson argues that retailers today are generally not offering especially attractive reasons for customers to cough up their personal data.

I think Richardson may have a point and, if so, it’s a deliciously ironic point. When the Web was in its infancy a decade ago, who would have guessed that consumers would trust some faceless?but well-branded?Web site more than the huge retailer down the street, which has been there for 20 years and which also employs friends of the consumer?

Richardson’s company hawks a service called PowerPay. It’s a loyalty program that allows consumers to be aggregated and to receive numerous loyalty-program-like benefits, but the twist is that it’s from multiple retailers and?most crucially?the retailers are never given the identifiable info about those consumers. This is intended to address consumer fears of being hassled by retail sales reps, which is perhaps overkill as so few brick-and-mortar retailers ever bother. To the consumer’s mind, though, this is a poetic trade-off: aggregation to avoid aggravation.

“We are trying to do for the traditional brick-and-mortar what [Amazon and eBay] do with their browsers and cookies,” he said.

Smart System started with sports arenas, where game attendees can buy an overpriced hot dog and a warm beer and get points that can be used at movie theaters or grocery stores. By making the transactions anonymous to the retailer, it addresses consumer hesitation.

More importantly, though, it delivers a strong multimerchant opportunity for the consumer, which in turn delivers a much more rich set of CRM-captured information for the retailer. If the retailer isn’t going to use the actual name and phone number of the customer, why alienate some consumers by asking for it?

“Being able to know and recognize your consumer by profile, for example, gives you a much better opportunity as a marketer,” Richardson said. “If you can segment and appeal to those segments, you can make more meaningful and powerful offers.”

On a practical level, PowerPay is somewhat interesting as a way of sidestepping consumer privacy fears, but it has a much more practical?and cynical?value. Like many other outsourced CRM approaches, it is delivering the kind of cross-marketing and true CRM customer-specific marketing that many brick-and-mortar retailers should be doing, but aren’t.

Think of it as a retailer’s professional workout program. Sure, the argument goes, people could exercise on their own for a lot less money. That may be true, but if they’re on their own, how many actually will?


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.