Ice Cream Shop Uses RFID To Broadcast Latest Inventory

Written by Evan Schuman
May 13th, 2010

At Izzy’s Ice Cream Café in Saint Paul, Minn., a teenage scooper has just dished up the last of the strawberry cheesecake ice cream. When she pulls out the RFID-tagged strawberry label and replaces it with one for lemon custard, a colored dot of light on the wall announces the change to all within viewing distance. Within three minutes, the Web site is identically updated, deleting strawberry and welcoming lemon.

While the co-owner of this family-owned scoop shop said he likes the RFID technology, he’s fonder of the push nature of his current flavor updater–where he tells his customers what he has–rather than the pull nature of a system in which his customers tell him what they want.

Several years ago, we profiled the then-CIO of ice-cream chain Cold Stone Creamery, who spoke of where the industry might go. She envisioned customers swiping their CRM cards as they get in line, thereby allowing scoopers to learn that the line includes 22 loyal customers who always order mango-peach ice cream. This knowledge allows scoopers time to get a new bucket from the back before those customers get to the head of the line.

Today, such plans would almost certainly factor in mobile, which would allow customers to place their orders while at the end of the line and, in turn, to make more intelligent decisions. Mobile would also allow more orderly and faster service.

But Izzy’s co-owner Jeff Sommers wants none of that. He wants customers coming into his shop because they trust his taste and want to taste his latest concoctions and other new offerings.

The people who come to Izzy’s only in search of one particular favorite flavor—he dubs them “specialized customers”—will either find the inventory there or they can leave, to return another day. If they like that flavor so much, Sommers concludes, they’ll be back.

Beyond the wall and the Web site updates, those RFID-powered ice cream flavor labels also blast the updates to Sommers’ Twitter feed, an E-mail list and a Facebook page. The site also allows customer customization, so they can sequence their flavors in various rows and spot their favorites more quickly.

Sommers’ attitude is refreshing. Because mobile apps allow for greater customer feedback and involvement, it sometimes takes an executive at a smaller or family-owned business to push back and say, “Thanks, but no thanks. I know my business better than my customers do, which is why they pay me. If I start delivering what they are seeking, it may initially feel like customer service but it actually devaluing my service and expertise. It’s like playing the lowest cost game: No one can win that game, at least not for very long.”

Using technology to hear from customers is great. But allowing those customers—through that technology—to take over the business may not be in either side’s long-term interests. Just a thought in this CRM- and mobile-crazed moment.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.