In A First, Chinese, Russian Retailers Crack 250 Largest List

Written by Evan Schuman
February 9th, 2008

Further evidence of a growingly global retail community materialized this week when the annual list of the world’s 250 largest retailers showed chains from China and Russia. It was the first time merchants from either country had placed in the top 250.

The top entries from those countries that made the list were China’s Bailian Group (7.5 billion Euros), which entered the list at number 101, and Russia’s X5 Retail Group NV ($3.6 billion) at number 191, according to this story in India Retailing.

The complete list itself also shows other changes in the world, with Tesco PLC ($80 billion) assuming its place as the world’s fourth-largest retailer, pushing Germany’s Metro AG ($75 billion) down to fifth.

Wal-Mart kept its number one slot. Indeed, Wal-Mart’s $349 billion group sales for 2006 is more than three-and-one-half times the roughly $98 billion reported by France’s Carrefour S.A., widening Wal-Mart’s lead over the world’s second-largest retailer. The American HomeDepot chain ($91 billion) came in third.

The rest of the Top Ten were dominated by American retailers ($66 billion Kroger at #6, $60 billion Target at #7, $60 billion Costco at #8 and $53 billion Sears at #9) except the #10 slot, help by Germany’s Schwarz Unternehmens Treuhand KG (52.4 billion Euro).

That Tesco/Metro change marks "the first movement among the Top five since 2003," according to the India Retailing story.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.