India’s Internet Usage Soars 27 Percent

Written by Evan Schuman
July 23rd, 2008

New stats out of India show three things: a sharply growing acceptance of the Internet (27 percent year-to-year increase); embracing of American sites (the top three most popular sites were from Google, Yahoo and Microsoft); and huge growth potential, given that barely 3 percent of its people today use the Internet.

The latest data points, courtesy of a report issued Monday (July 21) by Comscore, have several encouraging points for global e-tailers looking to tap India’s 1.1 billion people, which is more than triple the U.S.’s measly 303.8 million people.

Google dominated the top spot with several of its properties, the report said, "including Google Search (up 38 percent to 17.1 million visitors), social networking site Orkut (up 39 percent to 9.3 million visitors), blog platform (up 102 percent to 7.3 million visitors) and video site YouTube (up 131 percent to 6.3 million visitors)."

After Google, Yahoo hit with 18.7 million visitors (a 28 percent increase), followed by Microsoft with 12 million (an 11 percent increase).

"Indian portal ranked as the top local property with 9.2 million visitors (up 19 percent), followed by government site with nearly 6 million visitors (up 5 percent)," the Comscore report said.

Rounding out the top site list after Microsoft and Rediff (numbers four and five on the list) were AOL, NIC.IN, Times Internet Limited, Wikipedia, Naukri, eBay, Indian Railways, CNET, Ask Network, and Monster Worldwide.

Some other interesting numbers from the report:

  • " The average Indian Internet user visited the Internet 25 times during the month and was online for 28 minutes per visit."
  • " Those between the ages of 15 and 24 were the heaviest Internet users among all age segments, spending nearly 12 hours online per month on average."
  • " Some of the fastest growing Web site categories during the past year included Maps (up 64 percent), Sports (up 60 percent), Entertainment — Movies (up 55 percent), and Finance — News/Research (up 52 percent)."

  • advertisement

    Comments are closed.


    StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

    Most Recent Comments

    Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

    I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
    Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
    A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
    The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
    @David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

    Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.