advertisement
advertisement

This is page 3 of:

Information Overload And Why Your Car Doesn’t E-Mail You

September 11th, 2010

Drill-down is OK. Some people and some business processes will require a deeper level of detail. Building a system capable of drilling into more information is OK, but make sure users don’t start there.

  • Adapt an information trade-in policy. Ask users to give up five pieces of information for every new one they request. Get the users thinking about a low-information diet.
  • Straight-to-video isn’t just for bad movies. If people want to have access to data for historical reference or “just in case”, then push the raw data into a database for later retrieval. Do not create reports for problems you haven’t had yet and may never have. It’s a waste of time and money.
  • Analytics is not a business process. One of my co-workers used to say that with business intelligence systems, the third question someone asks is the most powerful. The idea is that while investigating one piece of information, you are lead to another and then another. It’s not uncommon to find significance in something you weren’t even looking for. Although I am advocating a low-information diet, that doesn’t mean you have to restrict the people who truly need information for analytical purposes. Their requirements will be different from those who simply need the information as part of a standard business processes.

    I think too much data is out there. What I really want is information that will help me make decisions and take action. I want the overwhelming glut of data being produced boiled down to a few critical pieces of information that will help me. That’s it. I want it to help me. I think our users want the same thing (even if they don’t know it yet).

    Term Of The Week: “Rublish”–spending a significant amount of time creating and publishing documentation that 95 percent or more of the intended audience will not read. “We spent the last two weeks of the project working on a bunch of rublish for the intranet.”

    What do you think? Leave a comment, or E-mail me at Todd.Michaud@FranchiseIT.org. You can also follow me on Twitter: @todd_michaud.

    You can follow my Ironman training at www.irongeek.me.


  • advertisement

    Comments are closed.

    Newsletters

    StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
    advertisement

    Most Recent Comments

    Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

    I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
    Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
    A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
    The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
    @David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

    StorefrontBacktalk
    Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.