Is JCPenney Dumping The Datacenter?

Written by Frank Hayes
July 12th, 2012

JCPenney’s IT layoffs announced on Tuesday (July 10) aren’t just the next shoe dropping after the 1,100-store chain’s COO publicly shredded its IT operations in May. The job cuts also signal that the retailer is preparing to dump a huge part of its current IT operations—especially anything with a whiff of legacy big iron to it—without necessarily having anything ready to replace it with.

The purge also sets the stage for the chain’s “new technology platform” that CEO Ron Johnson said will be announced in August. From all indications, the focus will be on mobile and in-store, not the datacenter.

The layoff announcement was skimpy on details, and the company refused to elaborate on how many of the 350 jobs cut were in IT or to identify what functional areas will take the hit. (Finance, product development and sourcing also shared in the layoffs.) But sources inside JCPenney said that about 100 IT staff were laid off this week, which is on top of about 130 who were sent packing in April. All told, this amounts to at least 25 percent of JCPenney’s IT staff.

In a statement, Johnson said, “We have simplified processes, removed unnecessary work and reduced layers to help us make better and faster decisions.”

That would sound like the usual downsizing boilerplate except for comments that COO Michael Kramer made at the May earnings presentation, when he described JCPenney’s IT as “a mess.” He also said its portfolio of 492 major applications should be cut to 100, with a minimum of customization to cut maintenance costs.

That gives the CEO’s statement a new implication: JCPenney is ripping out everything in the headquarters datacenter that’s not essential to keeping the stores open and replacing the remainder with off-the-shelf systems. It will be up to store managers and associates to figure out and conform to the new “simplified processes” that the off-the-shelf systems dictate.

That’s not a bad thing, in principle. In fact, it’s what JCPenney should have been doing all along—streamlining processes, retiring legacy systems and rationalizing the application portfolio. But that’s not what the chain’s previous management was willing to spend money on, so it didn’t happen a bit at a time. Now IT will have to make a major transition fast, and with fewer warm bodies to smooth the process.

But it also means there’s no chance that IT at the datacenter level will give any significant help to the turnaround effort at JCPenney. IT will be too busy with rip-and-replace-or-don’t projects to provide any competitive advantage. Once that work is done, the remaining non-customized applications will offer pretty much what any competitor that buys the same products will be able to do.

Where will the focus shift? IT in the stores, on the Web and mobile. Even after the layoffs, the chain still has job postings for an E-Commerce project manager and a Java developer—a good indication of where its efforts will be focused.

All that makes sense—in theory. In practice, it’s useful to compare JCPenney with another big, struggling retailer with an oversupply of legacy systems in its datacenter: Sears. Stuck with legacy systems that took far too long to run pricing models, Sears CIO Keith Sherwell invested in “Big Data” analytics that could crank through huge amounts of transaction data in a fraction of the time. (In April, Sears commercialized that effort in the form of its MetaScale subsidiary—no other retailers were invited to be customers.)

Now that’s a commitment to the value of the datacenter, even as legacy systems are rolled out the door. (In fairness, there’s no indication that the shiny new Big Data technology has saved Sears—it seems to be struggling as much as ever.)

Should JCPenney be making Sears-like forays into new datacenter technology? Maybe it should. But that’s looking increasingly unlikely. CEO Ron Johnson is calling the shots, and he believes in the store experience. He’s also clearly an Apple true-believer, which suggests his view of technology is from the small-device end of the telescope. COO Michael Kramer is a sometime CFO who’s focused on the numbers, and datacenters look awfully expensive.

That leaves CTO Kristen Blum, who now fills the CIO role. Her resume (CIO at Abercrombie & Fitch, supply-chain and retail-store IT director at Apple) makes it clear she understands there’s a lot that the datacenter can do for a big retailer when it comes to innovation.

Whether she’ll have the budgets and resources to do anything useful at JCPenney remains to be seen.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.