How Popular Is Mobile Video?

Written by Evan Schuman
November 21st, 2006

Is portable video not the killer app some have touted or is its time simply not yet here? Both questions are raised with new data–from the Nielsen Media Research people who, if nothing else, should really know television–suggesting that iPod users rarely use their video capabilities. This is true even of users of the Video iPod, who apparently liked the idea of portable video more than the real thing.

Nielsen found that less than one percent of accessed iPod content, including content from iTunes, was video. That number increased slightly–but just slightly– for Video iPod users, who opted for video about 2.2 percent of the time. According to The Hollywood Reporter, those numbers improved a bit when the question was changed from the number of items played to the number of minutes player, but not dramatically. “Even measured by duration of consumption, where 30- or 60-minute TV shows might seem to have a built-in advantage over three-minute songs, video comprises just 2 percent of total time spent using iPods or iTunes among iPod owners,” the news report said. “Video iPod users consume video 11 percent of the time.”

Does this mean that consumers are not interested in Web video? Not necessarily. First, laptop and PC screens are much more suitable to video, as least for first-generation efforts. Secondly, those numbers aren’t so bad for this new a media format. If it hasn’t materially changed in one year, then there may be trouble in videoland.


One Comment | Read How Popular Is Mobile Video?

  1. Video + IPTV: 6 Ways Good? - Says:

    […] Then Storefront Backtalk asks if mobile video is all that popular. Seems a Nielsen survey suggests that very few (less than 1%) video iPod owners use the video capabilities. Seriously, only someone very young, with good eyesight, is going to watch a “lot” of mobile video. The screens are just too damn small. I tried. On my 320×320 screen Treo. Not enjoyable. And who wants to carry around something over 5 inches in size. A device has to fit in a pocket or purse. That leaves only HUDs, heads-up displays. Mobile video, for me anyway, leaves a lot to be desired – like actually working. These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. […]


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.