Kindle Deleting Paid-For Books—And Other Amazon Digital Nightmares

Written by Evan Schuman
July 23rd, 2009

As Amazon this week was experiencing the latest in a lengthy series of digital embarrassments—involving its e-book reader Kindle going into customers’ collections and deleting already-paid-for copies of (so help me) Orwellian classics 1984 and Animal Farm–it also had to fend off the latest assault attempt by Barnes & Noble. Indeed, as Barnes & Noble was offering an E-book version of Sense and Sensibility, Amazon was showing a remarkable lack of both.

And in the meantime, Amazon was also finalizing its $807 million acquisition of A busy week in Amazon Land.

Amazon has long held a much-deserved reputation for stellar technological execution, which is why their dastardly diabolical and delicious digital download delete disasters are so damn depressing and destructive. (Fear not. That last sentence has satisfied by alliteration needs for the next month.) In short, digital downloads bring with them a huge number of unanticipated IT problems, in what is likely a preview of mobile commerce nightmares around the corner.

The Orwellian situation started innocently enough. Amazon apparently had a deal—or someone at Amazon thought they had a deal—with the Orwell publisher to offer E-book versions of those two classics. Amazon offered them for sale and consumers started buying.

At some point, the publisher either changed its mind or clarified its intent. Either way, the publisher said that it did not give permission for electronic versions. Amazon then removed the books from its store.

At that point, the story gets unclear. It might be that when the books were removed from the Kindle download area, the system—like other client-server systems—fully deleted it, which included going out to its client devices (the Kindles owned by consumers) and deleting them. That scenario has Amazon unintentionally deleting those consumer copies.

The more nefarious version is that Amazon’s people knew exactly what they were doing and that they completely erased everything in an attempt to appease the lawyer-happy publisher. That version falls under the Permission Versus Forgiveness school of thought, where Amazon would rather ask consumer forgiveness after the deletions.

The only hint is that Amazon officially has now said that it would not automatically remove purchased copies of Kindle books “if a similar situation arose in the future.” Of course, it’s not clear what Amazon would consider a “similar situation.” It would have been much more reassuring had Amazon said “This was an error. From now on, if someone pays for an E-book, it’s will be their property and we can’t take it back, no matter what.”

Update: Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos stepped up the plate on Thursday (July 23) afternoon and issued the following statement: “This is an apology for the way we previously handled illegally sold copies of 1984 and other novels on Kindle. Our ‘solution’ to the problem was stupid, thoughtless, and painfully out of line with our principles. It is wholly self-inflicted, and we deserve the criticism we’ve received. We will use the scar tissue from this painful mistake to help make better decisions going forward, ones that match our mission. With deep apology to our customers.” It’s a little late, but it’s an excellent start.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.