Mattress Retailer Sends Online Chat Transcripts To The Stores

Written by Evan Schuman
January 4th, 2008

Retailers aggressively support the idea of merged channel, but have a lot of difficulty in the implementation phase.

One $200 million retail chain——is taking a baby step toward merged channel, by sending copies of online chat transcripts to the local brick-and-mortar. "Having the complete transcript of what the customer is looking for onscreen in the store facilitates the sale," EVP Joe Vicens was quoted as saying in an Internet Retailer story.

The effort is indeed encouraging, but it’s not an especially complex effort. The chain requires the customer to request the store to access the file. That cleverly accomplishes two objectives.

First, it shows a respect for privacy and makes the customer feel in control. But from an IT perspective, it sidesteps the need for an automated trigger and a Zip Code lookup. The transcript is stored and it won’t go anywhere until a customer-initiated action causes an employee to look it up, presumably with an identifying number the customer was given to mark that exchange.

From a low-tech level, much of the same could be accomplished by the customer printing out the exchange and bringing it with him to shop, but it’s quite encouraging that store associates can access the data directly, although only when prompted.

But at least this mattress chain isn’t taking its merged channel potential lying down. (My apologies but it was too easy to resist.) To make the transitions from multi-channel to cross-channel to merged channel is difficult, but customers can’t understand why.

When a customer spends 90 minutes with a chain’s call center employee describing a problem in excruciating detail, why should he/she have to start anew when talking with a physical store associate? (We’re going to skip over the question of why those details need to be repeated as the customer is transferred from call center employee to call center employee. That’s a different column.)

The ultimate merged channel environment is actually a knowledge management challenge, in the sense that the data already exists in various databases (the computer screens in one of your call centers, for example) and in the heads of quite a few of your employees. KM addresses two hurdles: knowing all of the data that you’re collecting in untold number of ways and somehow cataloguing it; figuring out how to get that now-identified data to the people who need it.

That truly is the essence of the biggest merged channel hurdle. Attitudes and conflicting incentives are also issues, but that’s the case with most large knowledge management projects.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.