Mobile: The Death Of Impulse Purchases

Written by Nick Holland
December 8th, 2010

Nick Holland has spent the last decade covering the intersection of the mobile and payments industries. He currently covers all things mobile-transaction related at Yankee Group.

Until recently, physical-world merchants have had location and expediency to their advantage. If the customer has entered a store and tried on the shoes, there is a good chance that she has passed the point of no return and is going to leave the store encumbered by a shoebox in a glossy plastic bag. That’s a classic impulse buy. But once you insert a smartphone into that process, the impulse buy becomes an endangered species.

Now the customer enters the store, tries on the shoes, opens a price-comparison app, scans the barcode on the shoebox, finds the same shoes for 20 percent less online with free overnight shipping, takes off the shoes and leaves the store looking a bit smug because she’s just found a bargain—and another impulse purchase is dead.

But this is just a few tech savvy folks using their phones for price comparisons, right? Wrong. Yankee Group 2010 data shows that 38 percent of smartphone users are performing price comparisons using apps and mobile browsers. In four years, we can expect a quarter of the entire U.S. population to scrutinize retail prices using their phones before opening their wallets.

Not everyone agrees that price comparisons will kill impulse buys, though—including StorefrontBacktalk Editor Evan Schuman, who lays out his alternative view this week. But the pressure on impulse buying will only get greater. If a quarter of the population in four years will be comparing prices over mobile, what percentage of the population will it be in eight years? Or 10? Smartphone penetration will only continue to grow, as will the level of consumer comfort with using price-comparison services.

Further, we can expect people to articulate to friends and family how they scooped up a bargain on their new plasma screen using their smartphone rather more than how they didn’t really do the research and got swept away by all the shiny lights. Price comparison shows intelligence and cunning when confronted by aggressive sales staff—it is a personal story of David versus Goliath. Impulse purchases are the opposite, showing personal weakness—they are a dirty little secret that probably isn’t to be shared with others.

Will price comparison kill impulse purchases? For some areas that really aren’t that significant, and where the impulse is in the context of a larger sale, probably not. We can, for instance, still expect to see copies of People magazine and boxes of Tic-Tacs at the checkout aisle for the foreseeable future. There also will be mission-critical impulse purchases where the component of immediacy makes buying there and then a ‘no-brainer.’ Imodium, for example.

But, for single item purchases and especially for bigger ticket items, the connected consumer will increasingly shop around while shopping, and shopping around now means anywhere on the planet. This is where the balance will really be tipped for impulse buys—where the customer trying on a pair of shoes is no longer over the threshold from window shopper to buyer.

So how can retailers counter the globally price savvy consumer? Because frisking visitors for smartphones at the door may be frowned upon by shoppers, it will be up to retailers to match knowledge with knowledge, particularly understanding where they can provide immediate advantages over the competition. Can they beat the price? Are there hidden costs that the competition isn’t divulging? What is the actual difference between the time of purchase and the time of delivery? How is the competition’s reputation for service and after-sales support?

Irrespective of how retailers compete, empowered consumers will continue to grow in numbers, with a corresponding decrease in purchases made without research. The thrill of immediacy will inevitably be trumped by the strength of savvy. Impulse purchases will eventually go the way of the Furby. Which, incidentally, I bought as an impulse purchase (I still have buyer’s remorse). Please reach out to me and share your thoughts.


2 Comments | Read Mobile: The Death Of Impulse Purchases

  1. Andy Snipper Says:

    While there is little question that the Smartphones will impact on those retailers who persist in trying to fool unsuspecting buyers the retailers who want to survive will adapt – probably by offering an offer-matching service. This might be along the lines of inviting the customer to do a lookup while in the store and then offering to match the offer that they have found – not the price but the value offer. Other retailers will stop offering kit that is available everywhere and look for the ‘niches’ where they can hold their own in terms of competition. Good retailers have always had to adapt to change and they will adapt to this as well.

  2. Nick Holland Says:

    I’d agree Andy. I see mobile as a great leveler here. Complacent retailers who have relied on obfuscation as a means of staying afloat will have their work cut out, but those that clearly, fairly and transparently compete will win out. If handled well, this is an opportunity, not a threat, with customers appreciating the candid and honest merchant.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.