NetChoice: Parental Consent Law Will Stifle E-Commerce

Written by Fred J. Aun
August 24th, 2009

What’s the worst Web-related law on the books in America? According to Internet lobbying group NetChoice, it’s a Maine measure that next month will require Web sites to obtain parental consent from 14- to 17-year-olds before collecting from them even rudimentary personal information.

The Maine law, slated to go into effect Sept. 12, tops NetChoice’s iAWFUL (Internet Advocates’ Watchlist for Ugly Laws) and the organization asserts the law will threaten online communities and E-Commerce.

“The Maine law imposes severe limitations on all Web sites that serve teenagers,” said NetChoice in explaining its decision to put the law at the top of the list. “At the very end of its session, the Maine legislature voted to require Web sites to obtain ‘verifiable parental consent’ before collecting personal information from teens. Lawmakers approved the measure despite the fact that Web sites have no means to confirm such consent, and would be effectively forced to stop providing valuable services like college information, test prep services, and class rings.”

NetChoice started publishing iAWFUL in June and has regularly updated it as states continue to get involved with taxation and regulation of the Internet. “The Internet is increasingly under attack as lawmakers seek to mandate technological behaviors, impose new taxes and otherwise restrict the free flow of information and commerce online,” said a statement issued by NetChoice Executive Director Steve DelBianco.

In an interview, DelBianco said that he’s “in active discussions” with Maine’s attorney general about the “constitutional problems” posed by the law. DelBianco also said he filed a lawsuit on Wednesday (Aug. 26) seeking to have the law waylaid until it can be further reviewed by the state legislature.

DelBianco said the law exposes retailer Web sites to lawsuits because it empowers lawyers “to sue companies that collect any personal information, like a name, on a teen without verifiable parental consent” while never explaining how those Web sites are supposed to get, or guarantee the accuracy of, that consent. “In the state of Maine, lawyers have no need to chase ambulances anymore,” DelBianco said. “These attorneys can just follow the school buses home from the high school and ask each kid which sites they signed onto lately.”

He said the law was passed “at the final hour of the Maine legislative session” and pushed through as a way of stopping drug companies from marketing acne medications to teens.

Four of the other nine measures on the latest iAWFUL might impact E-Commerce players, DelBianco said. The organization cited the creation, not by state legislatures but by tax officials, of taxes on digital downloads in Colorado and Washington State. The Colorado measure would impose sales tax on the downloading or printing of documents or Web pages while the Washington Department of Revenue wants to tax digital “goods” but not services, according to NetChoice. It includes a North Carolina plan to apply sales taxes to downloaded movies, music and software.

“The tax bureaucrats never take a vacation,” DelBianco said. “If a legislature wants to tax, then a legislature has to do it. I have grave concerns over revenue departments enacting new taxes. It’s not their job.”

The iAWFUL includes federal and state bills intended to crimp “organized retail crime” asserting they “create unwarranted, extraordinary burdens on online marketplaces.” NetChoice cites the Massachusetts’ HB 1344 and the federal Combating Organized Retail Crime Act of 2009 (S 470), the Organized Retail Crime Act of 2009 (HR 1173) and the E-Fencing Enforcement Act of 2009 (HR 1166).

“These bills would mandate online and off-line marketplaces to investigate suspicious sales, place disclosure requirements on online marketplaces, impose obligations upon online marketplaces to police small retailers absent evidence of criminal activity,” a NetChoice statement said. “The Massachusetts bill provides for the forfeiture of any property used or intended to be used to commit or facilitate a violation and is so broad that it could encompass a company’s servers and domain names.”

DelBianco said the laws are endorsed by retailers who believe their employees are engaged in the online selling of goods they steal from stores. However, he believes such retailers “are misguided in trying to blame this entire problem on the Internet. They claim the Internet and sites like online auctions are driving people to lives of crime and making them steal, but I oppose this misguided, misplaced blame for what is just employee theft.” DelBianco, noting organized crime “has been around long before the Internet,” said retailers would be “much better off focusing attention on better security measures and screening of employees.”

The NetChoice list also names of North Carolina and Rhode Island for their efforts to impose so-called “Amazon taxes” in which affiliates of will be forced to pay sales taxes. Similar measures were introduced or considered, but withdrawn, in California, Hawaii, Maryland and Virginia. New York’s remains in effect while Amazon pursues a legal challenge against it, DelBianco said.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.