Netflix, Amazon Top E-tailer Customer Happiness; CompUSA, OfficeMax Dominate Customer Sadness

Written by Evan Schuman
December 28th, 2007

U.S. consumers are roughly just as satisfied—or unsatisfied—with 2007 online merchants as they were in 2006, according to the latest E-Commerce customer satisfaction survey from ForeSeeResults.

Also roughly the same was the sequencing of the top—and bottom—players, with Netflix, Amazon, QVC, L.L. Bean and Apple faring the best and OfficeMax, CompUSA, SonyStyle, Overstock and grabbing the worst slots. Taking the most improved awards were Costco, Avon and Zappos.

For the weak performers, the report said, CompUSA and OfficeMax both suffered from pricetag issues.

"Customers are least satisfied with the price element for both of these retailers," said ForeSee CEO Larry Freed. "Especially in the current tough retail climate, customer satisfaction laggards will need to do more to meet and exceed customers’ needs or risk further erosion of satisfaction, loyalty, and eventually, market share."

For the record, the report allowed that there is the possibility that some retailers fared even worse than CompUSA and OfficeMax because three retailers—Quixtar, CDW and PC Connection—"do not have posted satisfaction scores for 2007 due to insufficient respondent data."

In the most improved category, the report said the changes were likely brought about through various, unrelated issues.

"With a customer satisfaction score increase of 4.3 percent from last year to a score of 72, Costco is most improved this year from the perspective of online holiday shoppers," the report said. "This increase was a result of improved satisfaction with all elements driving satisfaction, especially price. Even so, a score of 72 places Costco in the bottom half of the Top 40 Index."

Zappos increased by 4 percent "driven in large part by satisfaction with the brand. Customers are 3.9 percent more satisfied with Avon Products’ website this year than in 2006," the report said. "Avon’s increase to a score of 79 was a result of improved satisfaction across all elements, led by satis¬faction increases with site experience, brand and price."


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.