New Starbucks POS System Behind Its M-Commerce Problem?

Written by Evan Schuman
October 7th, 2009

Starbucks’ recent problems with its iPhone M-Commerce application–specifically its inability to facilitate actual purchases—are the result of its preparations to replace the chain’s entire POS system, according to a vendor that has been in discussions with the coffee chain about mobile integration. From Starbucks’ perspective, it made little sense to integrate a mobile application into a system that was about to be gone, thereby forcing the mobile integration to have to be redone from scratch, said Jorge Fernandes, CEO of Mobibucks, a mobile vendor that, according to Fernandes, was in talks with Starbucks recently about a payment application.

Fernandes’ comment is consistent with suggestions from Starbucks headquarters managers—along with other Starbucks employees—that the lack of POS integration is a temporary issue, although no one said when or how the problem would be resolved. Starbucks did not respond to a request for comment on Fernandes’ remarks. Even if true, the question remains of why Starbucks didn’t simply delay the entire mobile application until the POS situation was resolved. Presumably, the chain wanted an iPhone application out in time for the holidays and believed that partial functionality was better than none.


2 Comments | Read New Starbucks POS System Behind Its M-Commerce Problem?

  1. david waxman Says:

    wonder if the new POS system will employ open loop contactless? future iphone’s very likely will have RFID whereby the phone could be used to make actual purchases.

  2. Kiril Alexiev Says:

    Starbucks via a mobile payment platform is looking in the future of replacing cash or card payments with virtual money. How about an iPhone application to purchase Starbucks coffee? The bill for each goes either on your bill or on your credit card account. A development like this one will likely change the point of sale terminal requirements for the coffee chain, and why not for all other innovative stores?


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.