Offering A Precise Makeup Look Via An Imprecise E-Commerce Screen

Written by Evan Schuman
August 25th, 2009

The very nature of a sale of makeup involves subtle shades of color differences, being mapped atop the widely varying contours of a customer’s face and bathed in the light of the venue where the customer most wants that makeup to be seen.

That’s a tall order for a Web audience, where dozens of different kinds—and qualities—of computer screens are being used, set to an infinitely greater number of varying settings in an ever-growing number of browsers.

And yet, if any segment of retail was underutilizing the magic of interactive E-Commerce, it’s the glossy side of facial retailing: makeup. One vendor, selling through and one unidentified pharmacy chain (not one of the four largest), is about to try and address that.

The vendor is an interactive media agency called—appropriately—Daily Makeover and it will encourage customers to upload photos of themselves and the system will then project what various makeups will look like on their skin. Kiosks offering a soupled-up version of the service will be deployed in retail locations, assuming a retailer agrees to the move, said Paul Krygowski, Daily Makeover’s product VP.

(Editor’s Note: Although three executives [a VP, an Executive VP and the CEO] and a public relations person from the vendor involved, Daily Makeover, said that customers will be able to use the service and then make purchases on, an official with stressed that the relationship with Daily Makeover is solely through an affiliate network called Linkshare. “We have thousands and thousands of affiliates and they are not on our site. They can drive business to us and sales, but if somebody is using that technology, it is on their site,” said Anne Marshall, the public relations director for, and But after hearing Marshall’s comments, Daily Makeover stuck to its position, saying that visitors to will indeed be able to make purchases after having used the technology on the vendor’s site.)

The need for this kind of interactive E-Commerce is significant, given that many retailers selling makeup—especially pharmaceutical chains—often have minimal mechanisms for customers to conveniently and fully try them out.

The Daily Makeover approaches uses facial recognition technology to try and show consumers what their face will likely look with various makeup options.

“When a woman uploads her photo, her face is instantly traced so that all the different application techniques such as a smoky eye shadow effect can be superimposed on her face in the correct area. Daily Makeover’s virtual try-on technology includes new rendering functionality, visualization technology and face-tracing capabilities and has the largest range of makeup finishes — satin, matte, metallic, shimmer, stained, dewy, sheer, and glossy — to reflect the true properties specific cosmetics create when applied,” according to a statement Daily Makeover issued. The service “has incorporated an option for women to adjust the placement and coverage levels of foundations, concealors, lip colors, eye shadows, mascara, and blush. The application also includes an enhanced facial recognition component.”

That’s pretty sophisticated stuff, especially when factoring in how imprecise color representations have historically been on consumer monitors, with their many setting options. Will what appears on the screen truly look like what will appear on the face? The old resolutions to this dilemma—with sites suggesting to consumers specific settings that should work best for that site—seem ineffective. Even suggesting that a better color match would be found with a good color printer (“All The Hues That’s Fit To Print”?) seems too pushy.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.