Online Sales Tax Bill Could Help Chains With Taxes, Too

Written by Frank Hayes
April 24th, 2013

Online sales taxes are marching toward reality much faster than anyone would have expected even a month ago. The “Marketplace Fairness Act,” which would allow states to collect sales taxes through online retailers even if the merchants don’t have physical operations in those states, is being debated in the U.S. Senate this week after being fast-tracked to avoid the Senate Finance Committee, where every previous version of the bill since 2001 has died.

One key element of the bill that won’t relieve the tax pinch but should simplify the implementation: A state can’t start requiring collection of the taxes until it provides free software that nails down all the complexities of that state’s sales tax structure, including automatic calculation of what rates are owed on which products for any location in the state.

On Monday (April 22), the Senate voted 74-20 to begin floor debate on the bill. That margin suggests the bill will eventually be passed by the full Senate, though possibly with some amendments. A final Senate vote could come as soon as the end of this week.

The bill, S. 743, would exempt online merchants with less than $1 million in out-of-state sales that would be subject to sales tax. That $1 million number is one of the most likely details of the bill to change. Some opponents—including eBay (NASDAQ:EBAY), which e-mailed 40 million of its users and sellers starting last Sunday (April 21), lobbying for an exemption for sellers with less than $10 million in sales or fewer than 50 employees.

The other key limit for each state is technical, in the IT sense: No state can require the tax collection until it provides free software for merchants that calculates sales tax due on each transaction, files sales tax returns, and is updated to reflect rate changes. Using the free software—or software from a provider the state has certified—will relieve the seller from liability or penalties if the seller didn’t remit the tax due to buggy software or incorrect information provided by the state.

States will also have to provide 90 days’ notice of all changes in tax rates, and have a single place where the sales taxes are to be paid. In other words, if Podunk raises its local sales tax, it’s the state—not the online retailer—who has to keep track and collect the tax, and can only start requiring it will 90-days’ notice.

And states will have to detail what products are covered and how tax boundaries are drawn.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.