Price Comparison Sites Beware: Expedia, Agree To Make Key Changes After Lawsuit

Written by Fred J. Aun
January 27th, 2009

Web sites providing E-Commerce price comparisons—especially those that point consumers to local brick-and-mortar locations—may want to consider adding features that could benefit physically disabled consumers. Either that or risk the fate suffered by Expedia and

Following a lawsuit, Expedia and have agreed to augment their sites’ search capabilities so people with disabilities can find and book hotel rooms that accommodate their special needs. The hotel-booking sites were sued in California Superior Court” on the grounds that they did not provide ways for people with disabilities to determine whether hotels offered special accommodations.

In a settlement, and Expedia agreed to revise their Web sites to include filter options for accessibility features on the hotel search pages. They will also present a field for accessibility features in the “Quick Facts” section of their property summary pages. This field will be shown only for hotels that say, in response to a survey, they offer accessibility features. In addition, lists will be provided of the accessibility features in the sites’ full description pages and there will be drop-down menus of those features on the reservations pages.

Both and Expedia will clearly define the accessibility features as well as provide users with instructions on how to use their sites’ new search tools. “Our settlement has the potential to revamp the entire travel industry if competitors of and Expedia realize this is a win-win situation for both disabled consumers and the travel industry,” said Victoria Ni, a lawyer with Public Justice, one of the plaintiffs’ law firms, in a statement.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.