Radio Shack Tries Rebates That Focus On What The Customer Did Not Purchase

Written by Fred J. Aun
June 24th, 2009

Radio Shack is launching a rebate experiment at the end of next month (July 27) that focuses on what the chain believes the consumers opted to not buy.

Consumers will go to the chain’ site and use codes from their POS receipts to begin the process.

“We have the demographic information and we’ve got the fact they bought, say, a cellphone and, more importantly, what we have is what they didn’t buy, such as a warranty or accessories,” said Chris Quinlan, the CEO of a vendor called Ohana that is working with Radio Shack on the trial.

“During the process of validating that rebate online, we give them the opportunity to spend that money directly at for a bonus or for specific products that have a higher probability they are going to purchase. It’s not just arbitrary,” he said. “The retailer and rebate sponsor, in this case the cellphone company or Radio Shack, also benefit. That rebate amount is spent back on a specific rebate sponsor or at the retailer. We’re vastly eliminating the escheat issue because the money is being spent.”

Ohana receives the POS information from Radio Shack and validates that the purchase requirements for the rebate offer are met. “We then interrogate the data to take into consideration the demographic information, such as name, address, where you live, age, purchase information and what you didn’t buy like a warranty or case,” Quinlan said. “We put all that information through our system. The response to the consumer is an offer that has a high probability of being acted on because it is specifically targeted to that consumer.”

With the new Radio Shack system, customers are not forced to buy something from Radio Shack. They can also get their refunds in the form of an “open-loop” MasterCard that can be used anywhere or as a Radio Shack gift card.

He said no secure personal information is shared with Ohana. “All that information is owned by the rebate sponsor,” Quinlan said. “It’s Radio Shack’s information. We have marketing programs we work on with Radio Shack regarding the harvesting of e-mail, but it’s completely the property of Radio Shack.” Quinlan said the system requires no changes to Radio Shack’s POS system.


One Comment | Read Radio Shack Tries Rebates That Focus On What The Customer Did Not Purchase

  1. Mark Price Says:

    What a fascinating way to monetize rebates! The challenge was, and will be, to get consumers to go to the web, to the RS website, and actually go thru the process. Traditionally, less than 1% ever mail in their rebates; web response rates may be higher, depending on the amount of verification necessary.

    The personalization of offers addresses one key need that loyal customers have — recognition. To succeed, this system must be integrated, tho, into the total customer experience seamlessly.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.