Sam’s Club Finds Dollars In Charging Customers For Loyalty

Written by Evan Schuman
June 3rd, 2010

When Wal-Mart’s Sam’s Club—which makes $47 billion a year on its own—added personalized discounts last summer under the eValues brand name, it was seen as a traditional way to boost sales through discount coupons. But what Sam’s Club discovered is that it quickly became its own direct revenue stream.

The chain made the customized coupons program—available to members either through in-store kiosks or online—only available to its Advantage Plus members, who pay $100/year, compared with a regular membership at $40/year.

But shortly after the program debuted, a large number of customers—the chain won’t say how many—upgraded their memberships and said it was solely or primarily for the eValues coupons, according to Kristy Reed, corporate communications manager at Sam’s Club. “Many upgraded to just get eValues,” she said.

The implications of this result are staggering. Other retailers struggle to get customers to even look at the coupons they are flinging from every direction. The kneejerk reaction to attempting to charge for such coupons could be that it’s the ultimate act of gall. (A little CRM chutzpa?)

But the Sam’s Club program’s apparent success—without numbers, it’s impossible to tell for sure—suggests it might instead be a wonderful example of value pricing. Throw anything at customers for free, and they’ll mentally value it accordingly: “It’s free, so it must be worthless junk.”

By charging for it, you tell customers the program is a valuable thing. There’s an implicit suggestion that the customer’s financial payback will be well in excess of the cost of the upgrade.

This nicely becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. The chain charges for the program and consumers believe it has a value. They gleefully pay for the upgrade. Having paid for it, consumers feel a strong obligation to actually use the program and its coupons/discounts. (Think six-month gym memberships.) The customers then actively use their loyalty cards and redeem those coupons. And lo and behold, they will have actually saved more than they spent.

Of course, this result depends on what the discount is for. Is it primarily for products the consumer is already buying? Seems unlikely: Why would a customer pay for a discount on something he/she was going to buy anyway? It’s more likely to push consumers to try a different brand or a new product they might have purchased elsewhere, if at all.

But Sam’s idea of charging for a coupon program is an idea that could certainly suggest non-traditional approaches for quite a few areas. A $20-a-month charge for the privilege of using the faster self-checkout lanes? An annual charge of $125 for the right to use a smartcart?


3 Comments | Read Sam’s Club Finds Dollars In Charging Customers For Loyalty

  1. Emma Jenkins Says:

    Very interesting – but is this such a novel idea after all? Consider the ‘Amazon Prime’ shipping/delivery service from Amazon. You pay an annual fee for ‘free shipping’ (i.e. the equivalent of coupons) and then you feel obligated to ‘get some value’ from it, so you order more items from Amazon? And by the end of the year, you’ve not only saved money on shipping, Amazon wins too because you bought more things there than you would have otherwise.


  2. Lee Says:

    It will be interesting to see how many upgraded customers will renew at the higher level.

  3. James Walter Says:

    Amazon Prime is actually a good deal. I’m not so sure about Sam’s Club. They used to be Sam’s Wholesale Club until some people figured out that they weren’t paying wholesale prices there. I’m not sure if there was a lawsuit involved.

    To me, Sam’s Club is Wal-Mart without the crowds.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.