advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Sears Clones Best Buy Movie Site, Both E-Tailers Lose

January 6th, 2011

Cutting those corners probably made it very inexpensive for Sonic to launch Sears’ movie download business. That’s cost savings on the IT side, but it’s very expensive from an overall E-Commerce perspective. If there’s literally no difference between E-Commerce sites from Sears and Best Buy, how can Sears compete? For Best Buy, there’s an even bigger issue: What happened to the E-Commerce differentiation it thought it had? Apparently those questions didn’t occur to either Best Buy or Sears when they cut the deals that resulted in twin, competing E-Commerce sites.

All outsourcing involves losing some control. That means CIOs have to be especially careful when IT work lands in another vendor’s hands. If you don’t look out for your business, it’s not likely that an outside vendor will—especially if that outside vendor is also doing deals with your competitors.

It’s not just the issue of two competitors whose E-Commerce sites look the same. If Sears didn’t spot that problem long before the Alphaline site went live, what else slipped through the cracks? Handing off the operation of an E-tail site to a third party is one thing. Giving complete control of customer information to a third party who is providing the same services to a competitor can make things very murky indeed.

Could customer reviews generated on one E-tailer’s site percolate to the “twin” sites of competitors? What about competitive data on what products sell best, or actual CRM data on specific groups of customers?

If you think that can’t happen, consider this: In 2008, a group of 109 McDonald’s restaurants in the Salt Lake City area decided to do a mobile commerce test. The work was handed off to a third party, mobile-coupon vendor Cellfire. But it didn’t occur to anyone at McDonald’s that nothing prevented Cellfire from pooling E-Commerce data with that from other Cellfire customers.

Yes, outsourcing is always high on the list of ways to cut E-Commerce costs. Just make sure it’s doesn’t end up costing you control of the business.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.