Starbucks Weighs In On “Download Mobile App Vs. Get Customers In-Store” Debate. And The App Won

Written by Evan Schuman
April 15th, 2013

A classic retail mobile question is whether it’s better to get shoppers in the store or to get them to download the retail mobile app. Starbucks (NASDAQ:SBUX), which has one of the most successful mobile payment programs in retail and also happens to not have the typical online-offline internal corporate conflicts, has come down squarely on the “’tis better to get the app downloaded” side.

For years, the coffee chain has pushed a promotion called Pick Of The Week, where it gave free copies of various pieces of digital media (songs, apps, games, etc.) to shoppers who went in-store and grabbed a card with a code on it. As of April 9, Starbucks has changed the program, no longer requiring the card to get the digital goodies. All it requires is downloading the app.

Starbucks’ site still touts the old rules. “Just to let you know—you can only download these in our stores, through the Wi-Fi Landing Page, or directly from the iTunes store if you have picked up a Pick Of The Week card from a Starbucks store,” the site says. The key point is that all of those methods required customers to get into a Starbucks to get the free content. The program eliminates that requirement, allowing customers to download the app and then get the content from anywhere.

The idea is that once shoppers download the app, that’s going to scream the Starbucks logo and various promotional messages constantly. In turn, that will likely get those customers into Starbucks stores a lot more often than if they were forced to go in to download a game or a song. And given that Starbucks is also pushing its products in the grocery aisle, those promotions and extra branding could help in many ways, even when customers choose to never set foot in a traditional Starbucks store.

“The intent is really to build a relationship. You don’t need to go into our stores,” said Linda Mills, a Starbucks senior manager for global brand public relations. “This is about educating about our product offerings and just engaging with our customers.”

Some initial reports suggested the chain was getting rid of the iTunes cards, but Mills stressed that the cards are not going away. “We are absolutely keeping the cards in place in our stores,” she said. “The Pick Of The Week cards are remaining.”

Unlike other chains where e-commerce sales can—politically—sometimes be seen as a challenge or rival to in-store operations, Starbucks has avoided those turf battles. That’s because Starbucks e-commerce sales represent relatively trivial amounts of revenue (there’s simply not that much to buy on its site, by design), meaning that site’s primary purpose is to drive sales at the stores and in grocery. Hence, there’s no reason for stores to resist online’s—or mobile’s—efforts.


One Comment | Read Starbucks Weighs In On “Download Mobile App Vs. Get Customers In-Store” Debate. And The App Won

  1. Andy Miller Says:

    Except they have alienated an entire mobile nation – the Blackberry users. Starbucks continues on with the “we are evaluating things” responses. For a company I respect…very interesting…


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.