“Store Locator” The Unsung Hero Of Web Analytics

Written by Evan Schuman
November 13th, 2008

When E-Commerce execs try and understand abandoned shopping carts, they often overlook concrete clues. One of the best is whether shoppers clicked on the store locator link right before leaving.

But deciding what to do about abandoned carts, that gets complicated. The innocuous-looking store locator is akin to waving a red cape in front of the face of an E-Commerce manager bull. In this case, even the bull is very real. And, yes, it all comes down to incentive plans, the least focused-on reason why Merged Channel programs so often fail.

That store locator observation was one of the more intriguing takeaways from a nicely done video on the Google Retail Advertising Blog. And Nikki Baird of Retail Systems Research took the next step, adding several of her takeaways atop what Google said, such as making sure you offer wishlists to make it more likely that customers are using shopping carts as shopping carts.

But Baird also suggested taking this store locator idea even further, by making it part of the shopping cart and offering in-store coupons to consumers as they’re trying to close their filled shopping cart. That’s where things get problematic.

From a strategic standpoint, I fully agree with Baird’s point, as I usually do. I make it a point to agree with people smarter than I am. (My favorite corporate line was spoken by a CEO who, when asked what he looked for in a senior exec reporting to him, said "Good Judgment. And by that, I mean that he agrees with me an awful lot." Oddly enough, it’s a much deeper thought than it initially sounds. But I digress….)

The disagreement is not with the strategic thought but the practical side. As much as we may preach the wisdom and benefits of merged channel, in-store and online managers still tend to distrust each other.

As non-team-player as it may sound, there are more than a handful of online managers who—given their incentive package—would find the choice of letting a customer abandon a cart for the arms of their brick-and-mortar counterparts difficult. Some managers, though, would rather convert a potential non-sale into a physical sale and use their time to find a different online customer.

Until compensation is radically rethought, that kind of poisoned thinking is undermining merged channel efforts through almost every segment of retail.

Pointing out ways to move customers to another channel presupposes that the executive is motivated to want to do that. They have to do it, they must do it, but when no one is watching, will they do it?

On Wednesday (Nov. 12), Escalate Retail announced a deal with Where 2 Get It to push a package that makes it easier to find a store. This effort faces two hurdles. Beyond the online-offline political resistance just described, Escalate’s package is solving a problem that most large retailers have already solved.

The package provides the typical Web store locator program plus "interactive maps, driving directions for store pick-up of online purchases, and links to driving directions built into purchase confirmation e-mails. The solution also integrates with the internal Contact Center so customer service representatives can quickly answer questions about the closest store location and directions."

These options make great sense for the chain, but until the manager issues and incentive plans are addressed, they’re going to meet the most difficult resistance out there: The silent kind.


One Comment | Read “Store Locator” The Unsung Hero Of Web Analytics

  1. Nikki Baird Says:

    Totally agree — measures, incentives, and compensation are still a major roadblock to cross-channel. Until retailers figure out how to get both channels working towards what’s best for the whole business — and more importantly, what’s best for the customer experience — most of the cross-channel efforts we’ll see out of them will be timid experiments at best.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.