Study: Holiday Online Sales to Jump 20 Percent

Written by Evan Schuman
October 28th, 2004

Forrester Research is projecting that online holiday sales this year will hit $13.2 billion, which represents a 20 percent increase compared with last year. That’s great when compared with a projected brick-and-mortar sales percentage increase of 4.5 percent for the same period, but much less so when compared with last year’s online retail growth of 31 percent compared with 2002.

Much of the slowed growth can be attributed to a simple statistical reality. Just a handful of years ago, e-commerce sales were miniscule, so when they started to climb, the initial statistical increases were huge because they were starting from such a low point. Now that online sales are becoming a respectable $13 billion, they won’t be able to sustain double-digit growth for very long.

Then again, online sales are still a footnote to total retail sales, which the National Retail Federation projects will be about $220 billion this holiday season.

Forrester’s analysis also suggests that, as e-commerce becomes more commonplace, it’s growth rate will more closely mirror that of its brick-and-mortar sibling. “Online is going to mimic overall economic conditions,” said Sharyn Leaver, a Forrester vice president and research director. “It’s pretty much as expected. There’s really nothing super surprising.”

One point in the Forrester report, though, was somewhat surprising. It suggests that fears about online success cannibalizing brick-and-mortar sales may take hold of executive’s ears this year and force them to deliberately back off of encouraging online sales.

“As the Web gets more mainstream, online sales have suffered from the same tepid sales as offline,” the report said. “Many online retailers will be forced to dial back promotions and push shoppers to stores, the channel in most danger of missing holiday sales forecasts.”

Leaver, who edited that report, said that despite all of the multichannel talk that retailers give these days, many retail execs still will do what they must to protect in-store sales. “Overall, the store sales are really more important to the retailer than online,” Leaver said. “We expect that retailers will not be pushing, pushing, pushing” online promotions.

The retail analyst said she was not suggesting that retailers would choke off marketing funds for online sites as much as encourage branding promotions (“Buy this great stuff here at Sears, online or at your neighborhood store”) instead of Web-only promotions (“Click now to buy online and we’ll take an extra 30 percent off.”)

“What they really don’t want to do is disincent consumers from going into the store,” Leaver said.

Part of the problem is that the Web has evolved into much more than a sales channel. It’s the store’s virtual front door, and it’s the way consumers research. The Web site must represent the entire retail operation and not merely online, so online managers must be encouraged to think of other company units.

That may be true, but when division sales teams are clawing over each other for those last few holiday sales, it’s hard to act in the holiday spirit.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.