Lousy Looking Apps Cost Retailers A Lot Of Money

Written by Todd L. Michaud
February 22nd, 2012

Todd Michaud spent years leading retail technology teams for Dunkin’ Donuts and Baskin-Robbins and today serves as the VP of IT for a billion-dollar franchise restaurant company. He also runs Power Thinking Media, which helps restaurants and retailers with social and mobile challenges.

Here’s a bit of heresy that will drive your business managers wild: When preparing app requirements, forget business requirements (it needs to provide a 5 percent increase in sales), functional requirements (it needs to ring up a sale) and technical requirements (it needs to be built on Windows). Instead, push to the top of the list interface design requirements (it needs to accomplish the critical tasks in the least number of clicks possible). Believe it or not, that’s where the money will come from.

Think about it, RIM had the BlackBerry on the market for years delivering E-Mail to business users around the world, but it wasn’t until Apple launched the iPhone and that mobile access to E-Mail became ubiquitous. And when it comes to design and usability questions, the best resources for the IT team to ask for help (outside of an actual Interface Designer) are the ones least likely to get the call: Marketing, Creative and Store Associates.

The impact of poor design and usability is significant. I have been involved in launching an application that showed a return of 2 percent in store profitability that never got traction because it was hard to use. Now, “hard to use” is a relative term. But I would suggest in most retail applications you use the same design standards as you do for your customers. Don’t expect your associates to put up with a poor design just because you pay them or because “the results are worth it.” If a retailer is willing to pass up on $20,000 per year in savings because the company thinks an application is too difficult to use, you start to get an idea of how important design really is.

I previously wrote that I think it would be an excellent idea to let the sales clerks design a POS interface. This could also apply to inventory, labor, ordering and clientelling applications. By better understanding how the system is being used, the application can (and should) be modified to deliver the maximum benefit/results.

The Marketing and Creative teams deal with “look and feel” all day long. Why not leverage that expertise to help design your application? If you were to treat your associates (the ones using the application) the same way you treat your end users (the users of your E-Commerce application), you would see a dramatic improvement in usability and overall usage of the application.

Part of the reason these teams do not get involved in retail technology projects is because they don’t directly support their goals of growing store sales. They are charged with finding more customers and getting them to spend more when they walk in the door. Asking them to help out in store operations, although it may indirectly impact their goals, isn’t going to make the CMO happy if those departments miss this quarter’s same-store sales target.

Another problem is that many IT professionals are burdened with a sense of pride when it comes to asking for help. There is this “tell me what you want done and I will go do it” mentality. Asking for creative input (or help, for that matter) on an application doesn’t jive with a lot of IT personalities.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.