Survey: Holiday Customers Value Customer Service Above All

Written by Evan Schuman
November 24th, 2004

Consumers are looking for black coal to put into their brick-and-mortar retailers’ stocking this holiday season, with complaints soaring about bad customer service experiences. But those same consumers are seemingly ecstatic with online customer service.

Some of those results?courtesy of a new survey from American Express and the National Retail Federation?are not surprising. In the same way that a politician can benefit from low expectations, many consumers seemed to have had lower expectations of online this year, so they were more easily favorably impressed.

Those good online experiences apparently mushroomed, as online consumers said they were eager to share happy online experiences and less eager to share equally happy brick-and-mortar experiences. The novelty of the online encounter is more interesting, which lends the Web site a nice viral marketing boost.

“Consumers like to share the highs and lows of their shopping experiences with family and friends,” said Katherine Mance, vice president of the NRF Foundation, the education and research arm of the National Retail Federation. “It’s no stretch to say that a single customer service experience, whether positive or negative, affects a retailer’s sales from a variety of consumers, not just one.”

The study found that a whopping 99 percent of shoppers interviewed said that customer service was at least somewhat important to them when deciding to make a purchase.

The survey found a mere 16 percent of brick-and-mortar shoppers who said they were extremely satisfied with their most recent customer service experience, while an additional 51 percent said they were very satisfied. In contrast, online shoppers were almost three times as likely to be extremely satisfied with their customer service experience (44 percent), and an additional 45 percent were very satisfied.

“Many retailers are putting renewed emphasis on customer service, but shoppers are telling them that even more needs to be done,” said John Theiss, vice president of Retail Industries at American Express Establishment Services. “This study identifies a wide range of service improvement opportunities that can have a meaningful impact on shoppers.”

How are consumers defining good customer service? Courteous treatment was the answer from 67 percent of the participants, while almost as many (65 percent) said they wanted to be made to feel like a “valued customer.”

Retailers lost points for some negative customer service behavior, such as pressuring customers to buy (69 percent) and being unable to find employees to help (61 percent). Having a “neat and clean store” was “extremely important” for 60 percent of the participants.

The customer service definitions change for online. The vast majority of online consumers (88 percent) said that “an extremely important component” of Web customer service is delivering “a safe and secure Web site.” On-time merchandise delivery (73 percent) and quick answers (74 percent) were also mentioned.

Privacy cropped up as a top concern with both online (78 percent) and offline (73 percent) customers, with a specific request that information not be shared with other companies. Accurate item pricing was another priority that hit home with both online (75 percent) and offline (71 percent) customers, along with the belief that merchants would fix defective products.

For that one, online customers (74 percent) were slightly more nervous than their brick-and-mortar (63 percent) counterparts. The survey also showed strong online and offline consumer desire for clear, fair and non-argumentative return policies.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.