The Challenge Of Bringing Group Shopping To The Web

Written by Evan Schuman
July 9th, 2009

One of the first revelations in the earliest days of E-Commerce was that there are two polar opposite ways that consumers shop: Utilitarian (buying a replacement battery, picking up a half-gallon of milk or a case of printer paper) and Experience (clothes shopping, comparing televisions, browsing a bookstore or test-driving cars).

The Web is wonderful at replicating—and sharply improving upon—the brick-and-mortar experience when it comes to utilitarian shopping, but brick-and-mortar has a huge edge when it comes to an enjoyable experience. Yes, for some people, shopping is a recreational sport and a social outing. By the way, those people tend to spend a healthy amount of cash. was one of the first to tackle recreating the bookstore experience. It’s first few attempts at recreating browsing a book fell far short, but it eventually mastered it with Look Inside.

Today, there are several companies trying to recreate the joint shopping experience on the Web. The problem is that early versions will truly be slow, non-intuitive and simply not anywhere near the fun of the real thing. Most of the efforts today involve two people logging onto a site and then clicking and dragging and annotating so that someone else can see what they’re doing and reply.

I’ve gone through several such demos and I compare it not to shopping in a store but to two people simultaneously Web shopping while talking on the phone. Say what will for it’s lack of elegance, but it’s reliable, virtually free, fast and is the ultimate in intuitiveness.

One of the more impressive offerings comes from a startup called, which is offering retailer-agnostic software, which is a differentiator from others that integrate with one retailer at a time. It’s impressive because it appears to be well-designed and thought out. But what’s most noteworthy is that it still pales when compared with the decidedly low-tech telephone-Web-interface.

To be clear, FriendShopper offers several intriguing capabilities that are well beyond the telephone tactic, such as being able to create a personal online mall populated only with that consumer’s favorite retailers. It can also keep a running list of a consumer’s favorite products. It’s sort of a merged registry and social networking experience. Very comprehensive and quite extensive.

But if my goal is to quickly go online with a friend, look at items for 20 minutes, get some immediate advice and make a decision, many of these offerings today are too clever for their own good. Many offer a wide range of clicks and drags and pulldowns that have to be executed to show which item is being discussed. On the phone, one could simply say, “I mean that red one in the right column, third from the top.”

FriendShopper’s approach is somewhat less complicated, but it’s still optimized for offline viewing at a later time. FriendShopper CEO Josh Bochner painted a picture where five friends can share the experience but not at the same time. His system is great at that. The counter he offered is that it takes a shopper a lot of keystrokes to explain that it’s the red one in the right column, third from the top. And that it might no longer be third from the top when the friend visits. The click function allows the friends to see precisely what the first friend wants to show.

These so-called shared shopping experience packages tend to be powerful at creating new experiences and especially at adding in the comments of a social network site, but they don’t do much in the area they were supposedly created to dominate: replicating the in-store experience of two friends hitting the mall together.

Mentioned the Look Inside feature from Amazon because that has a lot of similarities. It proved that these social in-store experiences can indeed be recreated, but it takes a lot of sophisticated and complex programming to make an intuitive seamless experience. If a user needs more than one or two minutes training on an app, it’s not that intuitive. How much training does a consumer need to figure out Look Inside?


One Comment | Read The Challenge Of Bringing Group Shopping To The Web

  1. david fishman Says:

    There is a lot of noise right now in the social commerce space and it will be interesting to see what precipitates. I’m sure some tech. Co. somewhere will come up with a platform that helps drive incremental sales through some social shopping experience….just a matter of time.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.