advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Toys”R”Us Chief Shows Gap Between CEOs, E-Commerce

September 12th, 2012

And that’s true whether they shop on a chain’s E-Commerce Web site, check a local store’s inventory online, call the store, ask an associate in person or walk down a store’s aisles. Remember, some of these customers want to save time by shopping in-store, buying on their mobile phone and having the product delivered at home. Others want to shop online from home and pick up the item in-store. Still others would really like to call ahead to have an associate pull the item, then pay online and get in and out of the store in 90 seconds.

That’s the merged-channel ideal—shop anywhere, pay anywhere, receive the merchandise anywhere. Anything less than that is a hole in the process. And, increasingly, customers have already figured it out.

Meanwhile, big chain E-Commerce execs are frantically working out what will be required for the necessary single view of inventory for stores, logistics for inventory balancing, compensation strategies for sales that cross the in-store/online boundary—and, ultimately, how to get rid of that boundary, because with a chain that’s doing merged channel, there’s no such thing. There are lots of technical and organizational legacy to plow up, in addition to new technical and organizational systems to develop, but at least E-Commerce execs have the picture.

But no one seems to have explained the picture to some retail CEOs. Yes, the CEO signed off on a lot of merged-channel initiatives. And every one of them provides a useful feature for customers (and, hopefully, more sales to more customers).

But as soon as each of those initiatives is done, it should become invisible. It’s easy to understand why a CEO wants to call out particular initiatives—it looks good for PR, and CEOs want initiatives to show a return on investment. But that won’t work with omnichannel, where—if it’s done right—every new project sends customers where they want to go, but not in ways that make it easy to calculate ROI. In reality, there’s no way to think about the ROI of an individual project when things are that intertwined. And the people who should be thinking through that under-the-covers stuff are the software developers—not CEOs.

Which means that if a CEO is proudly announcing the names of a batch of newly launched merged-channel services, either something is seriously wrong with how well integrated the chain’s operations really are, or the CEO needs a much better understanding of what merged channel actually means within the chain.

Either way—whether the chasm to cross is explaining to the CEO or integrating the merged-channel process—E-Commerce execs have their work cut out for them.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.