Using Mobile To Drive Buyers In-Store? That’s Not M-Commerce

Written by Frank Hayes
February 17th, 2011

Merged-channel retail is a tricky concept. Just because something mixes mobile and in-store doesn’t mean it merges those two channels—or even uses both of them well. The Associated Press (yes, the newspaper wire service) this month announced it’s testing a mobile-phone version of “preprint circulars,” the advertising sections that are stuffed into Sunday newspapers.

The idea is for newspapers to include a rich-media advertising module, dubbed iCircular, in their mobile Web sites or apps, and for retailers to advertise using it to drive customers to brick-and-mortar stores rather than to the retailers’ own mobile sites.

That probably sounds great to newspaper executives, who are losing advertising dollars to mobile and online. Maybe it will appeal to small local retailers if they’re having trouble with the notion of selling through more than one channel. But for major retailers, that approach makes no sense—driving customers away from their mobile commerce sites is exactly the wrong direction.

An interesting idea is at the heart of iCircular: mixing traditional newspaper ways of delivering advertising (such as targeting ads to readers in specific Zip codes) with product search, online shopping lists and deals that can be shared with friends. That sounds a lot like advertising-meets-M-Commerce.

Unfortunately, it’s not. It’s still traditional advertising. It’s telling would-be customers, “Don’t buy right now from your phone. Go to the store instead.”

What it should be telling customers is: “Yes, buy right now from your phone. Then go to the store and pick it up.” That approach would nudge customers toward the brick-and-mortar store, but without delaying the sale and giving the customers a chance to change their minds.

But that’s the type of mistake that’s likely to happen when the AP, which was founded by a group of newspapers, thinks about mobile. Ironically, the newspapers that founded the AP grew fat and profitable over the past 100 years because of advertising from big retailers. They’re shrunk over the last decade not just because retailers have moved their advertising online, but because retailers can actually sell online.

Mobile advertising isn’t M-Commerce. Customers want to buy when and where it’s most convenient for them—whichever channel is involved—not be driven from one channel to another. That’s what merged-channel retailing is, and retailers can’t afford to miss that point—even if the AP does.


One Comment | Read Using Mobile To Drive Buyers In-Store? That’s Not M-Commerce

  1. Jason Goldberg Says:

    The last thing I want to be is an apologist for the dead-tree media. In this case though, I have to disagree with your assertion that any call-to-action less than BuyNow M-Commerce is a mistake.

    The most important role for any e-commerce website owned by a multi-channel retailer is to drive sales in the STORE. For every $1 that Home Depot sells online, their e-Commerce site drives $60 in sales to the store, for Best Buy it’s $10. M-commerce is an even worse experience than e-commerce for now. How much fun is it typing shipping addresses and credit cards into your mobile phone? M-Payments will make this much better, and for some categories it may one day be the preferred channel, but for the next several years, the most profitable thing a mobile experience can do is drive sales to a retail store.

    I’m a big fan of offering the shopper a way to buy via whatever channel the shopper chooses, but in this case AP is probably targeting the highest volume user-story (at least for a couple years).

    Jason “retailgeek” Goldberg


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.