Walgreens First To Map Every Store In A Mobile App. Now If Customers Just Knew About It

Written by Evan Schuman
July 19th, 2012

Walgreens on Tuesday (July 17) announced that it has become the first national retailer to map all of its stores in a mobile app. That would certainly be good, were it not for the fact that it’s unlikely many of Walgreens’ customers will ever know about this. The reason is becoming a very sad and common retail trend: a chain embracing a technology just enough to permit it into its stores, but not one iota more.

That means no signage telling customers about it, no references on the retailer’s Web site (and certainly not its homepage), no marketing, no reference in E-mails to customers and no associate training so that at least they can tell customers. The mobile map app itself doesn’t even have Walgreens’ name, so if a customer using either an Apple or an Android smartphone—those are the two platforms supported—went searching for Walgreens, he or she wouldn’t find it. The only way to download the Walgreens map app is for a shopper to happen to know to search for the vendor’s name—Aisle411, in this case—and to download it. And for the unlikely consumer who does this, he or she still needs to use two apps—Walgreens’ app and the planogram app—to shop at Walgreens. Even the Walgreens mobile app makes no reference to the map app.

This problem has crippled contactless payment and slowed down the acceptance of mobile wallets. If a chain is going to embrace technology, part of that decision must be to let customers know about it and to make it as easy to use as possible (which means associate training). Otherwise, the chain will invest millions into a technology—an investment that will later be declared a failure, because few customers will bother using it.

Assuming that a few Walgreens customers discover the map app, this is what they’ll find: floor maps and product layouts for every Walgreens in the U.S., with a complete, integrated product list. That will enable a shopper to type in the name (Pampers diaper) or category (baby supplies) of any product Walgreens carries. The app will then place a shopping cart icon atop a pinpoint right where the product is supposed to be.

It’s a very handy device for a shopper who wants to quickly find an item, especially at a Walgreens store that he or she is not familiar with.

The app, though, pretty much stops there. There’s no attempt to locate the customer within the store, which eliminates any turn-by-turn directions to navigate the shopper to the product. In a Walgreens, that may not be much of an issue. But it certainly would be in a much larger footprint store, such as a Walmart or Target, and certainly at a Costco or Home Depot.

The app also doesn’t integrate with Walgreens’ systems, which means no inventory information. So if a customer is asking for where the extra-large band-aids are, the app will direct the shopper there, even if the store sold out of that product two weeks ago.

There is the ability to have pop-up promotions based on products searched for, but there’s no history of earlier searches and certainly no shopping history CRM integration with Walgreens.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.