advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Walgreens First To Map Every Store In A Mobile App. Now If Customers Just Knew About It

July 19th, 2012

In many respects, Walgreens seems to have given Aisle411 a download of all of its maps and left it at that.

That’s a shame, because this type of app—with a little more Walgreens integration (starting with inventory)—could be extremely powerful.

Nathan Pettyjohn, Aisle411’s CEO, said his team took 10 weeks to extract product placement data and a database of UPC information and to integrate those with mapping software. Given the limits of screen size on smartphones, Pettyjohn said design tradeoffs had to happen to keep the screens relatively free of clutter and make product locations obvious at a glance.

Full navigation, for example, had been done in other retail projects, but Aisle411 opted to not even try it with Walgreens. “The routing component became a nuisance. We got feedback that said: Why do you need to tell me to turn right on aisle 6? There was too much on the screen,” Pettyjohn said.

One design issue: If the shopper integrates a lengthy shopping list, it will place pindrops for all of them, with no visual indication of which product a pindrop represents. The shopper then needs to keep clicking on various pinpoints, which causes a small window to open indicating what the product is, until the desired product is found. Alternatively, shoppers could simply follow the line of pinpoints, confident that each represents some shopping list item and figuring that they will find out which one it is once they get to the aisle.

Aside from keeping the app a secret to its customers, this more simple approach to the app—no turn-by-turn, no real-time inventory, no active CRM component—has one definite advantage: The app reliably works. With many in-store apps actually functioning and doing so consistently is often more powerful than delivering sexier features.

A Google Maps trial with Home Depot last year, for example, was very sophisticated. So much so that it sent customers within those Home Depot stores to nearby Lowe’s—complete with street maps to guide them along.

From that perspective, a simple map program with every Walgreens’ layout and every Walgreens’ product is quite compelling. Now if any Walgreens customers could learn about it, then we’d have something.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.