advertisement Seeks To Unclarify Outage

Written by Evan Schuman
December 5th, 2008

On Black Friday (Nov. 28), crashed for about an hour, in a move that described as "scheduled maintanence." is now trying to clarify that position. Well, actually not. is saying that they want to clarify that position, but then E-mailed a statement that, well, doesn’t clarify much of anything. But it does do a nice job of hinting at something without actually saying it.

Let’s take this slowly. As was reported on Black Friday itself, was down for about an hour on Monday morning, ending at about 6:15 AM New York time. Keynote reported that the one change they could see—when comparing’s state before and after the "scheduled maintanence"—was that much of their content that had been hosting on their own servers was now sitting on servers at Akamai.

Late Thursday, Ravi Jariwala, public relations director at, sent an E-mail to at least one reporter that "wanted to provide some clarification." Always good to hear.

His next two lines, though, didn’t provide any clarification: "We’ve worked with Akamai for the past several years and the issue on 11/28 was unrelated to them. In fact, we quickly resolved the matter, and the issue did not impact any customer orders."

First, to our knowledge, no one ever question that they had been working with Akamai (although an Akamai spokesman on Friday morning wouldn’t confirm it, oddly enough). Not sure what "the issue on 11/28 was unrelated to them" clarifies. Keynote merely reported that the server names changed before and after the incident. All of the comments surrounding it suggested that the Akamai move might have been a response to something, as opposed to the cause. But without specifying what "the issue" was, analysis is impossible.

The E-mail doesn’t deny that the server names changed so it’s not clear what it’s supposed to be communicating.

The next line says that "we quickly resolved" this unspecified matter, which also isn’t a clarification. Is that intended to suggest that it was resolved in much less than the hour we had reported? More? Not clear what to take away from that sentence.

The phrase said that "the issue did not impact any customer orders." We’re at a disadvantage as we don’t know what "issue" is being referenced, but if it’s the site’s downtime, it seems a odd comment to make. Potential customers who went to the site at that time and couldn’t make any purchases—or see any information—were certainly impacted, as were the orders they might have made. If he had said it didn’t impact revenue, that would be one issue. Did he mean that it didn’t impact any orders that were in progress? Well, if the site was shut down, that would certainly prevent orders from being half-completed, I suppose.

But when we replied asking for the opportunity to discuss this on the phone to clarify the clarification, the reply came back: " Thanks for your message. At this point, we’ve provided the clarification and shared all the information we’re able to."

We debated what to do with this, as it doesn’t provide any true data, but we thought sharing the statement with all readers was the best route to take.


One Comment | Read Seeks To Unclarify Outage

  1. David Trebacz Says:

    Site seems to be down again -for the past 30 minutes they have been reporting:

    We’re Sorry!
    Our site is temporarily unavailable. We will be back shortly and appreciate your patience.

    In the meantime, if you need any assistance, please contact us at Thank you.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.