Why Not Use Mobile To Complete Offline Purchases In-Store?

Written by Todd L. Michaud
March 14th, 2012

Todd Michaud runs Power Thinking Media, which helps retailers and restaurants tackle the convergence of social, mobile and retail technologies. He had previously spent nine years delivering technology solutions to more than 10,000 retail locations as VP of IT for Focus and Director of Retail Technology for Dunkin’ Brands.

Retailers are using mobile all wrong. How about using the physical stores to save sales that were abandoned online? In other words, why not use mobile as the bridge between online and brick-and-mortar? For example, what if an apparel chain used its online shopping cart to pull a set of clothes for shoppers to try on in the fitting room of their local store at their convenience?

And here’s a crazy thought: What if the customer could tag an item in the retail store so that it automatically was added to their online shopping cart for future purchase? That is probably the first “lasting” use of QR codes that I can think of (the current URL shortening QR Code fad will fade faster than MC Hammer’s career). This would enable people who like what they see to purchase it later. Think of the “husband-and-wife” uses for this capability. “Honey, I really like the looks of this new washing machine, but wanted to let you check it out before I purchased it.”

When you are a hammer, everything looks like a nail. So when retailers see a smartphone, they see a store. Why is everyone so hung up on mobile commerce? Although it would be great if people flocked to making purchases on their phones, the reality is that the current mobile interface is difficult for traditional online retailing to work. There is only so much you can do with a 4-inch piece of glass. M-Commerce is but a small fraction of sales for most major brands.

If I was on or using the mobile app to look at certain products that chain carries, why doesn’t the retailer remind me of those items when I walk into a brick-and-mortar store with an offer to pick them up right now at a discount? It could even offer a promotional code with the discount, so I could properly close the loop on that transaction to see that my offer did or didn’t work. The smartphone is bridging that gap by identifying when a consumer is entering the store (via location-based services), offering a promotion based on online activity (Todd’s been looking at laptops online) and offering a promotion directly to that user’s phone (buy this model today and get an extra 5 percent off).

I have been having a lot of conversations recently about the role of smartphones in brick-and-mortar retailing. Depending on the person and the brand, the conversations are all over the place. M-Commerce, mobile payments, loyalty and location-based services are all hot topics and great opportunities for retailers to explore. But what I can’t understand is why more retail brands aren’t trying to figure out creative ways to use the smartphone as a bridge between their stores and their online operations (other than the obvious fact that, in many organizations, the divisions are completely separate and non-integrated. You know, small things like that).

This approach does require that you tie a person’s cell phone to his or her online account. I think this is easily accomplished with a registration process on the mobile app (and some worthwhile offer to convince the consumer to register; requiring it would be suicide).

Once you can tie the online site with the mobile phone and the user agrees to notifications by the app, then it is about creating a system that enables this “extended digital save” process to work. You would need to figure out the back-office processes around making and redeeming the offer, being sure to put in place fraud detection for those who try to game the system.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.