advertisement
advertisement

This is page 2 of:

Why Not Use Mobile To Complete Offline Purchases In-Store?

March 14th, 2012

The other thing this does is possibly breathe new life into mobile applications. We’ve all read the reports that show such a large number of mobile apps that are downloaded and used only a few times before being deleted or just abandoned. What if the app’s primary value to the consumer was an M-Commerce engine, but its primary benefit to the retailer was a simple communication vehicle with the consumer when it is geo-context sensitive.

There are so many uses for a smartphone that aren’t directly related to commerce:

  • The person who walks up to a car dealership and whose phone provides a list of cars he or she should test-drive based on both personal feedback and a ranking of how much time the consumer spent researching each model.
  • The electronic retailer figuring out which associate should engage with the customer based on what that customer researched online (removing the need for everyone to learn everything or chase through the store looking for someone who knows a product line).
  • A big-box retailer allowing a customer to tag an item in a store and then directing that customer to the online reviews for that item.

Then try is taking a picture of a retail item and pinning it to a board in Pinterest (I just had to throw that in here. There’s no such thing as a list without a Pinterest mention these days).

If I take a step back and look at my goals as a retailer, I would want to try and figure out a way to use technology to remove as many possible barriers to my sales. E-Commerce removes the proximity barrier to a sale, but it creates a sense of urgency. Although M-Commerce removes barriers to easy access to the catalog, it creates more challenges by trying to do to much in too small of an interface.

I’m not going to say that there are not plenty of M-Commerce opportunities out there for retailers to capitalize on, but I am saying that the benefits of having the consumer carry around a powerful computer in a pocket may go beyond easy-to-see dollars and cents.

What do you think? If you disagree (or even, heaven forbid, agree), please comment below or send me a private message. Or check out the Twitter discussion on @todd_michaud.


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.