Window Shopping Felonies

Written by Mark Rasch
December 6th, 2012

Attorney Mark D. Rasch is the former head of the U.S. Justice Department’s computer crime unit and today serves as Director of Cybersecurity and Privacy Consulting at CSC in Virginia.

Retailers are increasingly using data mining techniques to determine prices charged by competitors and then meeting or beating these prices instantaneously. Whether these techniques will survive the next couple of years is an open question. Like in the airline industry, where prices fluctuate and nobody knows the “true” price of anything, prices today fluctuate by more than 300 percent over the course of an hour based on data collected and analyzed by various pricing companies. Big data is cool and awesome, and it can help retailers compete. But depending on where the big data comes from, it can also land you in federal prison for computer hacking and trespass—even if that data is right there on a competitor’s Web site.

These firms overwhelmingly get this data from the same place anyone would—the Web sites or apps that are “publicly accessible.” This would be the same thing as sending out “secret shoppers” to competitors’ stores to scope out prices and report them back. Perfectly legal, right?

Not so fast. We all assume that it is legal to enter a store and jot down (or memorize) the prices that are there in plain view, whether it is a brick-and-mortar store or an online merchant. But that may not actually be the case.

(Related story: ” Is It Too Radical To Rethink Pricing Optimization Strategy? Hint: If The Answer Wasn’t ‘Yes,’ Would We Have Even Bothered To Ask The Question?”)

Take the case of Ronald Kahlow, who entered a Reston, Va., Best Buy that had advertised it had the lowest prices. Kahlow used his computer at the store to enter prices so he could comparison shop. When asked by a clerk to stop, he refused and was arrested—not for comparison shopping but for trespass. His “right” to be in the store was contingent on his following the “rules” of the store. Break the rules, and that right is revoked. And voilà! Criminal trespass. Even though Best Buy had no rule against comparison shopping, when the clerk asked Kahlow to stop and he refused, he was at that instant “remaining unlawfully” and, therefore, violating Virginia trespass laws.

Computer “hacking” and trespass laws were based on the same basic legal principles. The Web site, where a company “publicly” advertises its goods and services and shows its prices, is similar to the brick-and-mortar store. However, unlike the store, access to the Web site is granted subject to a “contract” between the merchant and the visitor, typically a “Terms of Use” agreement linked to on the bottom of the homepage. Visit the site, and you are agreeing to these terms. Violate the terms, and you are visiting the site unlawfully, exceeding the scope of your authorization to use the site. Or, in legal parlance, violating the computer hacking statute, 18 U.S.C. 1030.

Not only can you violate the federal (and similar state) computer hacking site, but if access to the Web site involves running any type of software (including a mobile app or, possibly, Java applets), you may also be agreeing to terms of an end-user license agreement or a software licensing agreement. Now things get even hairier. If you violate the terms of the EULA or the Terms of Use, not only are you “trespassing” but you are accessing the company’s copyrighted works (its publicly accessible Web site) and “copying” the contents (e.g., viewing the Web site) in violation of the copyright agreement. Now you can be subject not only to criminal trespass violations but to civil or criminal copyright violations.

Many online merchants, including Amazon, Walmart and Target, expressly prohibit companies from accessing their pricing data by “robot” or other data mining tools. Some may go so far as to expressly prohibit competitors from using data they see for competitive purposes. Amazon’s site says:

“Amazon or its content providers grant you a limited, non-exclusive, non-transferable, non-sublicensable license to access and make personal and non-commercial use of the Amazon Services. This license does not include any resale or commercial use of any Amazon Service, or its contents; any collection and use of any product listings, descriptions, or prices; any derivative use of any Amazon Service or its contents; any downloading or copying of account information for the benefit of another merchant; or any use of data mining, robots, or similar data gathering and extraction tools.”

Translated from lawyer to human speech, this means that a commercial entity (e.g., a competitor or data miner) may not look at the Amazon Web site and, in particular, may not collect prices for the benefit of another merchant.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.