Winn-Dixie, Publix Learn That No Eco-Friendly Deed Goes Unpunished

Written by Evan Schuman
November 17th, 2010

Chalk this one up to the ultimate eco-friendly rule: You can’t win. For years, grocery stores have been pushing their efforts to be seen as more environmentally friendly and one of the favorite techniques has been getting consumers to purchase reusable bags, instead of making the time-honored “paper or plastic” choice.

Reusable bags were good for the consumer, in that the bags held a lot more and the customer was often given a discount. And it was good for the retailer—who saved on the bag supplies—and it was good for the planet. What could possibly go wrong?

Winn-Dixie and Publix this week learned exactly what can go wrong: Lead. (Could these chains be called lead leaders?) “There is a need to look at this from a long-term environmental perspective to determine if the potential exists that these bags cannot be disposed of safely. For this reason, we feel it’s better to stop selling them now,” Winn-Dixie said in a statement. The problems began when The Tampa Tribune tested the bags. “Publix reusable bags had lead levels that exceed federal limits for paint and exceeded rules coming soon for children’s toys,” the story said.

The main culprit? Attractive eco-friendly pictures on the bags. “The more elaborate the illustrations on the bags, the more likely they contained toxins. Yellow and green paint on bags is a common carrier of lead.” And, yes, the bags were made in that lead-friendliest of countries: China.

Although lead is considered lethal at almost any level, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has set 100 parts per million as the threshold when action is required. According to the Tribune tests, some of the tested bags cleared that number, with two Winn-Dixie samples hitting 117 and 121 and two Publix samples hitting 87 and 194. Some Wegmans bags were found with 799.

That said, the story said it may not be as bad as it sounds. “The lead appears to be in a form that is not easily extracted or leached. It is not in a form that would rub off on food simply by touching the bag, like wet paint but, over time, bags wear down and paint can flake off and threads can fray, releasing the lead.”

Oh well. Guess it’s back to paper bags.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.