Alien Gives Up Its IPO Efforts

Written by Evan Schuman
August 4th, 2006

Eight days after it said it was preparing for an IPO on a day-to-day basis, Alien Technology–which had been granted the RFID trading symbol–has given up the attempt, according to a statement the company issued on Friday.

“Alien Technology Corporation today announced that the company has withdrawn its Registration Statement on Form S-1 with the Securities and Exchange Commission and has determined not to proceed with the registration and sale of its common stock at this time” the statement said.

Alien CEO Stav Prodromou updated the company’s earlier position, which was that they would go public when market conditions improved.

?Alien has decided not to proceed with an IPO at this time due to market conditions,? Prodromou said. ?While we are evaluating the options for our future financing needs, we are taking prudent cost reduction actions to continue to effectively manage and grow our business and support our customers going forward.?

The move was expected, as many industry analysts had questioned whether the timing was right for such a move, both because of industry-wide RFID challenges and Alien-specific hurdles.

In last week’s StorefrontBacktalk Week-In-Review audiocast, a panel of analysts concluded that the IPO had little chance of success.

And earlier this week, IDC analyst Pete Abell–who Alien officials had criticized for being too harsh–pointed to this week’s announcement by Texas Instruments of its new UHF RFID chip and said that it “really nails the coffin closed on Alien’s IPO.”

The fact that Alien is the first pureplay RFID vendor to try and go public–not to mention the fact that it won the heretofore-thought-to-be-coveted RFID trading symbol–made it an easy symbol for the RFID market in general. A year or so ago, that would be unmitigatingly positive force. Today, however, it’s a very mixed bag.

Alien?s IPO had been aimed at raising about $100 million, but it?s original offering documents raised concerns because of the IPO-candid way it had of discussing it?s inability to accurately predict the market and its own sales.


2 Comments | Read Alien Gives Up Its IPO Efforts

  1. Pete Abell Says:

    I hate to say I told you so on this one. It is better for the RFID IPO market that companies which have good fundamentals and solid business models get their opportunity to make the fledgling RFID market one where small investors will have a better chance to get a decent return on their investment.

  2. Chris Kapsambelis Says:

    Forget it! RFID is expensive, and unreliable. It will never surpass Barcode, nevermind replace it.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.