Is IT’s Invisibility Ducking An Issue Or Facing It?

Written by Evan Schuman
December 11th, 2007

A recent column about the lack of visible presence with digital signage prompted some interesting reader responses, but our favorite was the comment from the CIO of a large national chain who pointed out that IT’s lack of visibility is more likely an indication that IT is spotting problems others don’t want to see.

"Occasionally, Marketing, Purchasing, Operations, or the Facilities Management group have researched a topic, vetted vendors, purchased product and only then considered that they might need IT assistance in order to provide whatever it is with a connection to the Internet," said the IT leader, who asked to remain anonymous. "Then, when IT takes a look at this new technology and tries to bring up all the issues that should have been considered (security, reliability, support, incompatibility with other systems in the store), IT gets labeled as being difficult to work with and not team players. It isn’t a fair rap."

The CIO argued that it’s a mix of actors that can cause these problems. "I’ve worked hard to try to get in front of this and to get the other departments to think of IT as the ally and a resource to be leveraged, but still these things occur. Often, the people in the other departments just don’t see what the big deal is," he said. "It’s a sign of the times that people take Internet and network connectivity for granted and see nothing wrong with plugging whatever into the store’s hub just like plugging a lamp into a 115v outlet. Add to that clueless and unscrupulous vendors who try everything possible to get a deal signed without bringing IT into the loop."

He gets a sad but true point. I’m reminded of a conversation with another CIO from a years ago. It was Charlie Weston, the CIO of Winn-Dixie back in 2005, when they were working through a bankruptcy.

Weston described the radically different way other departments starting treating IT when budgets were being slashed and everyone had to get creative finding ways to do their jobs.

The IT department is the support facility that keeps the rest of the company functioning. It’s the adult who has to say, "Great idea, people, but it won’t work for these six detailed reasons. Sorry."

It takes a disaster—like Winn-Dixie’s bankruptcy—for departments to give up their turf battles and come running to IT for help.

But there is the other argument as well, that IT can’t get that respect and be seen as strategic if it allows itself to consistently get weighed down in the tactical and, well, nerdy.

Yes, there’s plenty of blame to share in most board rooms, but I still believe that most IT departments will be seen as more strategic if they can force their IT team members to truly think that way. Sometimes, it’s OK to let others be the adults.


Comments are closed.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.