advertisement
advertisement

Paul Singer, Former CIO at Target And Supervalu, Succumbs To Brain Cancer

Written by Evan Schuman
June 16th, 2010

One of the more beloved and respected retail IT leaders died Friday (June 11) after a bout with brain cancer. The 56-year-old Paul Singer, who had served as the CIO at both Target and Supervalu, fought the disease for 19 months.

A teleconference memorial, where participants will be invited to record their recollections of the man, will be held Mon., June 28, 4 PM (New York time). The call-in number will be 866-682-4770, with a Call ID of 2947254 and a participant code of 1234. Those interested in participating are asked to fill out the registry.

But some of his associates didn’t wait until then to start sharing. In a memo to Supervalu IT people, current Supervalu CIO Wayne Shurts listed some of Singer’s accomplishments at that chain.

“In just the few short years that he led our IT function, Paul successfully merged two IT organizations into one, set the framework for common systems, began a Vendor Management function to handle all IT-related vendor relationships, brought on Oracle as our chosen ERP partner and introduced the used of competitive events for technology sourcing,” Shurts wrote in a memo. “In addition, he expanded the company’s global reach by establishing Supervalu India.”

One of Singer’s passionate causes was helping global adoptions after he adopted three girls from Russia. He was a board member of the Congressional Coalition on Adoption Institute (CCAI), a board member of the Joint Council on International Children’s Services (JCICS) and cofounder of the Retail Orphan Initiative. In lieu of flowers, his family asks that memorial donations be made to Steven Curtis Chapman’s adoption foundation, Show Hope.

Indeed, Greg Buzek, president of IHL and one of the leaders of the Retail Orphan Initiative, sent an E-mail to supporters saying he would either like to rename his annual retail tech analyst panel session in January the “Second Annual Paul Singer Retail ROI Super Saturday” event or create an annual leadership/visionary award in Singer’s honor.

Cathy Hotka, a longtime retail IT guru, shared a story about Singer’s early career. “In one of his first jobs, he was selected to manage the auto bays at a Kmart store. He knew nothing about auto repair and asked current employees what they needed. They responded that female patrons, usually moms with little kids, felt uncomfortable in the seen-better-days waiting room,” Hotka wrote. “Paul worked with the longtime employees to ask for, and get, a minor amount of money from Kmart to paint the waiting area, buy subscriptions to women’s magazines and put in new chairs. Almost overnight, his auto bay was the best performing in the Kmart chain.”

Hotka said Singer’s personal charm went way beyond IT management. “Paul had a gift for making everyone feel special. I will never forget the kind way he’d say ‘Hi, Cathy,’ slowly, like he was savoring every moment of saying hello to me. He treated everyone this way.”


advertisement

Comments are closed.

Newsletters

StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!
advertisement

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

StorefrontBacktalk
Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.