RuBee May Be The Way Out For Frustrated RFID Proponents

Written by Evan Schuman
June 10th, 2006

When IEEE unveiled a major RFID alternative this week dubbed RuBee, it touted it as a way to avoid many technological problems with RFID. Mostly, though, it gave IT execs political cover to look at RFID alternatives without admitting failure.

For years, RFID proponents have pointed to item-level tagging as the Holy Grail, the ultimate payoff when all of the RFID pieces fell into place. That’s when full ROI would happen, out-of-stocks would become an age-old memory and smartcarts would become what The Jetsons had always intended.

As the industry joke went, the timetable for true item-level tagging would be five years away. It didn’t matter what year the prediction was being made. It would always be five years away, usually pinned to a five-cent-a-tag. That stopped recently when tag prices got close enough that five cent tags were no longer five years away.

The second Holy Grail has been sophisticated use of active tags, to track temperature or altitude or perhaps what radio station the truck driver was listening to. The CIO of 7-Eleven gave a great example of this, discussing how RFID tags could be used to insure fresher milk.

Consider that when you look at this week’s news from the IEEE that it was preparing a major alternative to RFID dubbed RuBee or?in IEEE’s colorful language–1902.1. (I think when the Borg named their drones, they followed IEEE naming protocols.)

On one level, RuBee addresses the two most striking challenges with today’s RFID deployments: the lack of practical roadmaps to both cost-effective item-level tagging and creative and pragmatic uses of active tags to capture environmental data.

But a potentially more interesting rationale lies in the middle of the politics of standards groups and of corporate bureacracies. The typical large corporation today has a culture that often undermines its efforts to do the right thing technologically.

Let’s take a hypothetical example. Fortune 500 CIO Smith decides to vigorously pursue?on the company’s tab?Technology Initiative Alpha. It’s 14 months later and it’s clear that Alpha isn’t working. The honest thing to do is for the CIO to go the CEO and the board and say, “Turns out that Alpha wasn’t a good idea. Let’s pull the plug and move on and stop wasting our money.”

But in corporate America, that’s suicidal. It’s admitting that you made a terrible decision and wasted the company’s money. CIOs have been fired for much less. The structure places huge pressure on the CIO to pour more into Project Alpha, hoping against hope that more funding will either turn it around or at least keep it limping along until the CIO can either get promoted or get another job.

For many companies, full-fledged RFID has become their Project Alpha. It’s hobbling along, doing some interesting things, but it’s not getting closer to delivering on the big promises that were made when the company started funding it. CIOs need an excuse to be able to explore alternatives without admitting failure. Hello, RuBee, you beautiful gem of an excuse to explore alternatives to RFID without losing face?or job.

There is an intriguing comment in the news story about RuBee where legendary RFID analyst Pete Abell?now with IDC’s Manufacturing Insights?talked of how HF RFID has been “forced upon (RFID standards group) EPC Global” against the wills of both Wal-Mart and the U.S. Department of Defense. “They were both hoping that UHF Gen2 would work for everything. Nobody wants to replace what’s already been done. The HF announcement is critical background to understand that there already was a crack in the armor.”

The EPC Global decision meant that both Wal-Mart and the Defense Department “are faced with the prospect of redoing their infrastructure. This opens up the options to considering something very different” such as RuBee, Abell said.

In other words, companies that have been longing for an excuse to open up this surgical patient again so they casually remove the sponge they left inside now have that excuse.

Some industry speculation has question whether the reassigning of Wal-Mart CIO Linda Dillman in April had indeed been prepping her for greater things or if it was an acknowledgement that her support for RFID might have been a tad too aggressive and enthusiastic. Even her successor’s statement reaffirming the retail giant’s support for RFID did little to quell such rumors.

Not all companies have been waiting for an RFID excuse, of course. Procter & Gamble has been getting very creative about ways to expand its definition of supply chain, moving beyond the distribution centers and backrooms and focusing in on showrooms, aisles, promotional displays and ultimately store shelves, smartcarts and POS. P&G cleverly proved ROI on a promotional campaign using RFID.

But Wal-Mart and P&G are not the norm. Then again, neither is a fully-functioning RFID program. RuBee may not fix that, but it at least gives CIO a face-saving shot at making some needed repairs.


One Comment | Read RuBee May Be The Way Out For Frustrated RFID Proponents

  1. Pete Abell Says:

    Refreshing to have an honest open view of what has been a PR exercise on making a technology standard that is not working to keep breathing. There are many companies that are doing 1-2 SKUs out of hundreds inorder to say they are complying with the mandate. Hopefully, companies will be able to try alternatives now that both RuBee and HF are in the mix.


StorefrontBacktalk delivers the latest retail technology news & analysis. Join more than 60,000 retail IT leaders who subscribe to our free weekly email. Sign up today!

Most Recent Comments

Why Did Gonzales Hackers Like European Cards So Much Better?

I am still unclear about the core point here-- why higher value of European cards. Supply and demand, yes, makes sense. But the fact that the cards were chip and pin (EMV) should make them less valuable because that demonstrably reduces the ability to use them fraudulently. Did the author mean that the chip and pin cards could be used in a country where EMV is not implemented--the US--and this mis-match make it easier to us them since the issuing banks may not have as robust anti-fraud controls as non-EMV banks because they assumed EMV would do the fraud prevention for them Read more...
Two possible reasons that I can think of and have seen in the past - 1) Cards issued by European banks when used online cross border don't usually support AVS checks. So, when a European card is used with a billing address that's in the US, an ecom merchant wouldn't necessarily know that the shipping zip code doesn't match the billing code. 2) Also, in offline chip countries the card determines whether or not a transaction is approved, not the issuer. In my experience, European issuers haven't developed the same checks on authorization requests as US issuers. So, these cards might be more valuable because they are more likely to get approved. Read more...
A smart card slot in terminals doesn't mean there is a reader or that the reader is activated. Then, activated reader or not, the U.S. processors don't have apps certified or ready to load into those terminals to accept and process smart card transactions just yet. Don't get your card(t) before the terminal (horse). Read more...
The marketplace does speak. More fraud capacity translates to higher value for the stolen data. Because nearly 100% of all US transactions are authorized online in real time, we have less fraud regardless of whether the card is Magstripe only or chip and PIn. Hence, $10 prices for US cards vs $25 for the European counterparts. Read more...
@David True. The European cards have both an EMV chip AND a mag stripe. Europeans may generally use the chip for their transactions, but the insecure stripe remains vulnerable to skimming, whether it be from a false front on an ATM or a dishonest waiter with a handheld skimmer. If their stripe is skimmed, the track data can still be cloned and used fraudulently in the United States. If European banks only detect fraud from 9-5 GMT, that might explain why American criminals prefer them over American bank issued cards, who have fraud detection in place 24x7. Read more...

Our apologies. Due to legal and security copyright issues, we can't facilitate the printing of Premium Content. If you absolutely need a hard copy, please contact customer service.